Diana Hudson v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

Filing 36

ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF 32 by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DIANA HUDSON, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 18-cv-03284-PJH Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF ALASKA AIRLINES, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 32 Defendant. 12 13 The court is in receipt of the parties’ joint “discovery” letter brief wherein plaintiff 14 seeks to exclude defendants’ two rebuttal expert disclosures. Having reviewed that 15 briefing and the supporting papers, the court finds that plaintiff’s position lacks merit and 16 therefore DENIES plaintiff’s request. 17 While the court has chosen to rule on plaintiff’s request now in order to permit the 18 parties to effectively prepare for trial, plaintiff’s request would have been more 19 appropriately brought as a motion in limine. The parties are warned that future 20 evidentiary matters should be raised in motions in limine in accordance with the timeline 21 and procedures set forth in the court’s pretrial order. See Dkt. 20. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 14, 2019 24 25 26 27 28 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?