Diana Hudson v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF 32 by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2019)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 18-cv-03284-PJH
ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER
ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 32
The court is in receipt of the parties’ joint “discovery” letter brief wherein plaintiff
seeks to exclude defendants’ two rebuttal expert disclosures. Having reviewed that
briefing and the supporting papers, the court finds that plaintiff’s position lacks merit and
therefore DENIES plaintiff’s request.
While the court has chosen to rule on plaintiff’s request now in order to permit the
parties to effectively prepare for trial, plaintiff’s request would have been more
appropriately brought as a motion in limine. The parties are warned that future
evidentiary matters should be raised in motions in limine in accordance with the timeline
and procedures set forth in the court’s pretrial order. See Dkt. 20.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 14, 2019
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?