Lee v. McGucken

Filing 73

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING 72 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

PERRIS J. LEE,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.

Case No. 18-cv-03689-HSG
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT
Re: Dkt. No. 72

E. KNOX, et al.,
Defendants.

12
13

Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. On March

14

30, 2022, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to

15

respond to the Court’s order, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and entered judgment in favor of

16

Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 65, 66. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for an

17

extension of time so that he may file a motion for reconsideration and possibly seek counsel. Dkt.

18

No. 72. Plaintiff’s request is DENIED as moot. There are no deadlines pending.

19

This order terminates Dkt. No. 72.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: 7/18/2022
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge