SPRAWLDEF et al v. City of Richmond et al

Filing 74

ORDER DENYING RESPONDENTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO STAY; CONTINUING SCHEDULE ON PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ONE WEEK ONLY by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 69 Administrative Motion. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2019)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SPRAWLDEF, ET AL.,
Petitioners,

8
vs.

9
10

CITY OF RICHMOND, ET AL.,
Respondents.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

CASE NO. 18-cv-03918-YGR
ORDER DENYING RESPONDENTS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO STAY;
CONTINUING SCHEDULE ON PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION ONE WEEK ONLY
Dkt. No. 69

12
13

The Court having duly considered the administrative motion (Dkt. No. 69) and opposition

14

thereto, the administrative motion of respondents City of Richmond, et al., to stay further briefing

15

or consideration of petitioners’ pending motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 64) is

16

DENIED.

17

The request, in the alternative, to delay filing of the City’s response to the motion for

18

preliminary injunction until September 17, 2019, is DENIED. The City has not offered facts

19

sufficient to establish good cause for a delay of this length.

20
21

The City shall file its response to the motion for preliminary injunction no later than
August 20, 2019.

22

Petitioners’ reply shall be filed no later than August 27, 2019.

23

The hearing on the preliminary injunction shall be continued from September 3, 2019, to

24

September 10, 2019, at 2:00 p.m.

25

This terminates Docket No. 69.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: August 8, 2019
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE