California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute v. Blue Cross of California

Filing 48

ORDER by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton setting briefing schedule and vacating CMC. (pjhlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE, Case No. 18-cv-04777-PJH Plaintiff, 9 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. 10 11 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, Re: Dkt. No. 47 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 13 14 The court is in receipt of the parties’ joint case management statement. Dkt. 47. 15 Both parties agree that the Ninth Circuit’s opinion remanding the case back to this court 16 included an instruction for the court to consider the remaining equitable estoppel factors. 17 See Dkt. 40 at 3. The parties propose to file supplemental briefing on the equitable 18 estoppel issue. Dkt. 47 at 2. The court agrees with the parties that supplemental briefing is warranted and, 19 20 accordingly, sets the following briefing schedule. Defendant shall file its supplemental 21 brief on or before August 27, 2020; plaintiff shall file its supplemental brief in opposition 22 on or before September 10, 2020; and defendant shall file its supplemental reply brief on 23 or before September 17, 2020. The matter will be decided on the parties’ briefings 24 without a hearing. The briefs shall not exceed 10 pages and need not include a table of 25 contents or authorities. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 Additionally, the court VACATES the Case Management Conference currently set for August 20, 2020, to be rescheduled if this case proceeds past the pleading stage. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 13, 2020 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?