Zomm, LLC v. Apple Inc.
Filing
43
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 39 Stipulation Permitting Motion to Dismiss Briefs to Exceed Page Limits. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DAVID R. EBERHART (S.B. #195474)
deberhart@omm.com
LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526)
lsimmons@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28ᵗʰ Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone:
+1 415 984 8700
Facsimile:
+1 415 984 8701
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
ZOMM, INC.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG
v.
APPLE INC.,
Defendant.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER PERMITTING MOTION TO
DISMISS BRIEFS TO EXCEED PAGE
LIMITS
Judge:
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG
1
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 7-12, Plaintiff Zomm, Inc. (“Zomm”) and Defendant
2
Apple Inc. (“Apple”) (collectively “the Parties”) hereby stipulate and request that the Parties be
3
permitted to file briefs regarding Apple’s motion to dismiss in excess of the applicable page
4
limits.
5
6
7
WHEREAS Apple’s response to Zomm’s Amended Complaint is currently due on or
before December 3, 2018;
WHEREAS Apple intends to move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to
8
dismiss for failure to state a claim each of the three causes of action asserted in Zomm’s
9
Amended Complaint, specifically the first cause of action for alleged patent infringement, the
10
second cause of action for alleged breach of contract, and the third cause of action for alleged
11
unfair competition under California common law;
12
WHEREAS Apple’s motion will address several complex issues including patent subject
13
matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101, pleading requirements for both breach of contract and
14
unfair competition claims, and federal and state preemption and supersession of unfair
15
competition claims; and
16
WHEREAS the Parties agree that due to the complexity of the issues and number of
17
causes of action to be addressed by Apple’s motion, the Parties should be permitted to exceed the
18
page limits for the opening and responsive briefs by ten pages and the reply brief by five pages.
19
20
21
It is hereby STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, subject to the
approval of the Court, as follows:
(1)
22
23
than 35 pages of text;
(2)
24
25
26
Apple is permitted to file a brief in support of its motion to dismiss of not more
Zomm is permitted to file a brief in opposition to Apple’s motion to dismiss of not
more than 35 pages of text; and
(3)
Apple is permitted to file a reply brief in support of its motion to dismiss of not
more than 20 pages of text.
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION RE PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
Dated: November 6, 2018
KELLEY DRYE AND WARREN LLP
3
4
By:
/s/ Michael J. Zinna
Michael J. Zinna
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ZOMM, INC.
5
6
7
Dated: November 6, 2018
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
8
9
By:
/s/ Luann L. Simmons
Luann L. Simmons
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.
10
11
12
13
14
15
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that all counsel of record is being served on November 6, 2018, with a copy of
this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system.
/s/ Luann L. Simmons
16
Luann L. Simmons
17
18
19
20
21
FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose
behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing.
/s/ Luann L. Simmons
22
Luann L. Simmons
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION RE PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
ER
R NIA
illiam J
r.
FO
J u d ge
d S. G
H a y wo o
H
9
RT
8
NO
7
D
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
DENIE States District Court Judge
United
LI
6
UNIT
ED
5
November 7 2018
7,
Dated: November ____, 2018
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
4
S
3
A
2
ORDER
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIPULATION RE PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?