Zomm, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Filing 43

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 39 Stipulation Permitting Motion to Dismiss Briefs to Exceed Page Limits. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAVID R. EBERHART (S.B. #195474) deberhart@omm.com LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) lsimmons@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28ᵗʰ Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 Telephone: +1 415 984 8700 Facsimile: +1 415 984 8701 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 ZOMM, INC., Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG v. APPLE INC., Defendant. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFS TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS Judge: Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE PAGE LIMITS Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 7-12, Plaintiff Zomm, Inc. (“Zomm”) and Defendant 2 Apple Inc. (“Apple”) (collectively “the Parties”) hereby stipulate and request that the Parties be 3 permitted to file briefs regarding Apple’s motion to dismiss in excess of the applicable page 4 limits. 5 6 7 WHEREAS Apple’s response to Zomm’s Amended Complaint is currently due on or before December 3, 2018; WHEREAS Apple intends to move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to 8 dismiss for failure to state a claim each of the three causes of action asserted in Zomm’s 9 Amended Complaint, specifically the first cause of action for alleged patent infringement, the 10 second cause of action for alleged breach of contract, and the third cause of action for alleged 11 unfair competition under California common law; 12 WHEREAS Apple’s motion will address several complex issues including patent subject 13 matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101, pleading requirements for both breach of contract and 14 unfair competition claims, and federal and state preemption and supersession of unfair 15 competition claims; and 16 WHEREAS the Parties agree that due to the complexity of the issues and number of 17 causes of action to be addressed by Apple’s motion, the Parties should be permitted to exceed the 18 page limits for the opening and responsive briefs by ten pages and the reply brief by five pages. 19 20 21 It is hereby STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows: (1) 22 23 than 35 pages of text; (2) 24 25 26 Apple is permitted to file a brief in support of its motion to dismiss of not more Zomm is permitted to file a brief in opposition to Apple’s motion to dismiss of not more than 35 pages of text; and (3) Apple is permitted to file a reply brief in support of its motion to dismiss of not more than 20 pages of text. 27 28 -2- STIPULATION RE PAGE LIMITS Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 Dated: November 6, 2018 KELLEY DRYE AND WARREN LLP 3 4 By: /s/ Michael J. Zinna Michael J. Zinna Attorneys for Plaintiff ZOMM, INC. 5 6 7 Dated: November 6, 2018 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 8 9 By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons Luann L. Simmons Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 10 11 12 13 14 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that all counsel of record is being served on November 6, 2018, with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system. /s/ Luann L. Simmons 16 Luann L. Simmons 17 18 19 20 21 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. /s/ Luann L. Simmons 22 Luann L. Simmons 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION RE PAGE LIMITS Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 ER R NIA illiam J r. FO J u d ge d S. G H a y wo o H 9 RT 8 NO 7 D Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENIE States District Court Judge United LI 6 UNIT ED 5 November 7 2018 7, Dated: November ____, 2018 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 4 S 3 A 2 ORDER N D IS T IC T R OF C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- STIPULATION RE PAGE LIMITS Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?