Zomm, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Filing 53

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 51 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule for Defendant's 45 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Non-Patent Causes of Action and Stay Plaintiff's Patent Cause of Action and to Adjourn Hearing Date. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

JOHN F. WARD (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL J. ZINNA (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
LEE BRENNER (State Bar No. 180235)
[e-mail]
DAVID FINK (State Bar No. 169212)
[e-mail]
DAVID G. LINDENBAUM (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WHITNEY M. SMITH (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ANDREW DUBIN (State Bar No. 292645)
[e-mail]
KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP
101 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10178
Telephone
212-808-7800
Facsimile
973-503-5950
Attorneys for Plaintiff ZOMM, LLC
DAVID R. EBERHART (S.B. #195474)
[e-mail]
LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28ᵗʰ Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

19
20
21

ZOMM, LLC,

22
23
24
25
26

Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG
Plaintiff,

v.
APPLE INC.,
Defendant.

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
COURT ORDER TO MODIFY
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S NON-PATENT
CAUSES OF ACTION AND STAY
PLAINTIFF’S PATENT CAUSE OF
ACTION AND TO ADJOURN
HEARING DATE

27
28

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG

1

Pursuant to the Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Zomm, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and

2

Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant”) hereby file this stipulation, requesting an order to modify the

3

briefing schedule on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Non-Patent Causes of Action and

4

Stay Plaintiff’s Patent Cause of Action (“Motion”) and to adjourn the hearing date for the Motion

5

until March 21, 2019. In support of this request, and as set forth in the accompanying declaration

6

of Michael J. Zinna, the parties state as follows:

7

1. On December 3, 2018, Defendant filed the Motion. (Dkt. No. 45.)

8

2. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion would be

9

due on December 17, 2018. Defendant’s Reply in Support of the Motion would be

10

due on December 24, 2018. The hearing on the Motion is currently set for March

11

14, 2019.

12
13

3. In light of the upcoming winter holidays, the parties have agreed to extend the
briefing schedule for the Motion as follows:

14

a. Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion will be due January 9, 2019.

15

b. Defendant’s Reply in Support of the Motion will be due January 28, 2019.

16

4. To accommodate pre-existing travel plans of Plaintiff’s lead counsel, the parties

17

further agree to adjourn the hearing date for the Motion until March 21, 2019,

18

subject to the Court’s convenience.

19

5. The change in the briefing schedule does not impact the hearing date for the

20

Motion and the modest seven-day adjournment of the hearing date will not delay

21

the overall resolution of the Motion.

22

6. This is the first request the parties have made to modify the briefing schedule on

23

this Motion and to adjourn the hearing date. The requested changes will not

24

impact any other deadlines scheduled in the case.

25
26
27
28

-2-

Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Court Judge

1

Dated: December 14, 2018

KELLEY DRYE AND WARREN LLP

2
3

By:/s/ Michael J. Zinna
Michael J. Zinna
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ZOMM, LLC

4
5
6

Dated: December 14, 2018

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

7
8
9
10

By:/s/ Luann L. Simmons
Luann L. Simmons
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3-

Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Court Judge

1
2
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that all counsel of record is being served on December 14, 2018, with a copy of
this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system.

4

Michael J. Zinna

5
6
7
8
9

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose
behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing.

10

Michael J. Zinna

11
12
13

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15
16

DATED: 12/17/2018

________________________________________
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
U.S. District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
Case No. 4:18-cv-04969-HSG