Robinson v. Alameda County et al

Filing 28

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 27 EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS 24 SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. Responses due by 11/4/2019 and Replies due by 10/18/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2019)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

BRANDEN ROBINSON,
Plaintiff,

8
v.

9
10

A. JACKSON,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 18-cv-06814-HSG
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION
Re: Dkt. No. 27

12
Good cause being shown, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file his opposition

13
14

to defendant’s summary judgment motion is GRANTED. Dkt. No. 27. Plaintiff shall file his

15

opposition by November 4, 2019. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the

16

date the opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is

17

due. No hearing will be held on the motion

18

This order terminates Dkt. No. 27.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge