Robinson v. Alameda County et al

Filing 28

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 27 EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS 24 SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. Responses due by 11/4/2019 and Replies due by 10/18/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BRANDEN ROBINSON, Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 A. JACKSON, Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 18-cv-06814-HSG ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 27 12 Good cause being shown, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file his opposition 13 14 to defendant’s summary judgment motion is GRANTED. Dkt. No. 27. Plaintiff shall file his 15 opposition by November 4, 2019. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the 16 date the opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is 17 due. No hearing will be held on the motion 18 This order terminates Dkt. No. 27. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?