In re NVIDIA Corporation Securities Litigation

Filing 158

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 157 Stipulation Setting Schedule for Filing of Response to Defendants' Motion to Strike. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2020)

Case 4:18-cv-07669-HSG Document 158 Filed 07/07/20 Page 1 of 5

1
2
3
4

KESSLER TOPAZ
MELTZER & CHECK, LLP
JENNIFER L. JOOST (Bar No. 296164)
([e-mail])
One Sansome Street, Suite 1850
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tele: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

5
6
7
8

BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER
& GROSSMANN LLP
JONATHAN D. USLANER (Bar No. 256898)
([e-mail])
2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2575
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: [phone]

9
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class
10
[Additional counsel listed on signature page.]
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

OAKLAND DIVISION

15
16

In Re NVIDIA CORPORATION SECURITIES
LITIGATION

CLASS ACTION

17
18
19
20
21

Case No. 4:18-cv-07669-HSG

This Document Relates to: All Actions.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING SCHEDULE FOR FILING OF
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO STRIKE
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Courtroom: 2

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:18-cv-07669-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR FILING OF RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

Case 4:18-cv-07669-HSG Document 158 Filed 07/07/20 Page 2 of 5

1

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Lead Plaintiffs E. Öhman J:Or Fonder AB (“Öhman

2

Fonder”) (“Öhman Fonder”) and Stichting Pensionenfonds PGB (“PGB,” and with Öhman Fonder, “Lead

3

Plaintiffs”) and Defendants NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA”), NVIDIA’s President and Chief Executive

4

Officer, Jensen Huang, NVIDIA’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Collette Kress,

5

and NVIDIA Senior Vice President, Jeff Fisher (collectively, “Defendants”) (together with Lead Plaintiffs,

6

the “Parties”).

7
8

WHEREAS, on March 16, 2020, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part
Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“CAC”), with leave to amend;

9

WHEREAS, the Parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order Setting Schedule for Filing

10

of the Amended Complaint and Answer or Other Response to the Amended Complaint on March 24, 2020;

11

WHEREAS, the Court granted the Parties’ Stipulation on March 25, 2020, ordering the Amended

12

Complaint to be due by May 13, 2020; Answer and Motions due by June 29, 2020; Responses due by

13

August 13, 2020; Replies due by September 14, 2020; and Motion Hearing set for October 15, 2020;

14

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiffs filed the Amended Complaint on May 13, 2020;

15

WHEREAS, Defendants filed the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, the Motion

16

to Strike Certain Allegations in Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, and the Request for Judicial Notice on

17

June 29, 2020;

18

WHEREAS, on June 30, 2020, the Parties met and conferred regarding a schedule for Lead

19

Plaintiffs’ filing of a response to Defendants’ Motion to Strike and any corresponding reply or responsive

20

motion thereto; and

21

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the response to Defendants’ Motion to Strike and any

22

corresponding reply or responsive motion thereto should follow the same previously stipulated schedule

23

as the response to the Motion to Dismiss and any corresponding reply or responsive motion thereto;

24
25

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties,
through their undersigned counsel, as follows:

26

1.

27

August 13, 2020.

Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve a response to Defendants’ Motion to Strike on or before

28
1
Case No. 4:18-cv-07669-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR FILING OF RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

Case 4:18-cv-07669-HSG Document 158 Filed 07/07/20 Page 3 of 5

1
2
3

2.

Defendants shall reply or otherwise respond to Lead Plaintiffs’ response to the Motion to

Strike on or before September 14, 2020.
3.

Any hearing on the Motion to Strike shall be conducted at 2:00 p.m. on October 15, 2020,

4

or at the Court’s convenience any time thereafter.

5

Dated: July 3, 2020

6

Respectfully submitted,
KESSLER TOPAZ
MELTZER & CHECK, LLP

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

/s/ Jennifer L. Joost
JENNIFER L. JOOST (Bar No. 296164)
([e-mail])
One Sansome Street, Suite 1850
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
-andANDREW ZIVITZ (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
MATTHEW MUSTOKOFF (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
NATHAN HASIUK (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
ERIC K. GERARD (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
280 King of Prussia Road
Radnor, PA 19087
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

18
19
20

Counsel for Lead Plaintiff E. Öhman J:or Fonder AB and
Co-Lead Counsel for the Class
BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER
& GROSSMANN LLP

21
22
23
24

JONATHAN D. USLANER (Bar No. 256898)
([e-mail])
Lauren M. Cruz (Bar No. 299664)
([e-mail])
2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2575
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: [phone]

25
-and26
27
28

JOHN C. BROWNE (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
JEROEN VAN KWAWEGEN (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
MICHAEL M. MATHAI (pro hac vice)
2
Case No. 4:18-cv-07669-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR FILING OF RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

Case 4:18-cv-07669-HSG Document 158 Filed 07/07/20 Page 4 of 5

1

([e-mail])
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

2
3
4

Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Stichting Pensioenfonds PGB
and Co-Lead Counsel for the Class

5
6

Dated: July 3, 2020

COOLEY LLP

7

/s/ John C. Dwyer
JOHN C. DWYER (Bar No. 136533)
([e-mail])
PATRICK E. GIBBS (Bar No. 183174)
([e-mail])
SARAH M. LIGHTDALE (Bar No. 4395661)
([e-mail])

8
9
10

CLAIRE A. MCCORMACK (Bar No. 241806)
([e-mail])
SAMANTHA A. KIRBY (Bar No. 307917)
([e-mail])
3175 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130
Tele: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

11
12
13
14
15

Attorneys for Defendants
NVIDIA Corporation, Jensen Huang, Colette Kress and
Jeff Fisher

16
17
18

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

19

Pursuant to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Civil L.R. 5-

20

1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of the foregoing document has been obtained from

21

each of the other signatories.

22

Dated: July 3, 2020

/s/ Jennifer L. Joost
JENNIFER L. JOOST

23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 4:18-cv-07669-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR FILING OF RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

Case 4:18-cv-07669-HSG Document 158 Filed 07/07/20 Page 5 of 5

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that:

3

1.

4

August 13, 2020.

5

2.

6

Defendants shall reply or otherwise respond to Lead Plaintiffs’ response to the Motion to

Strike on or before September 14, 2020.

7
8

Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve a response to Defendants’ Motion to Strike on or before

3.

Subject to any further order of the Court, the Motion to Strike shall be noticed for hearing

as part of the Court’s regular law and motion calendar on Thursday, October 15, 2020, at 2:00 p.m.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12

Dated:

7/7/2020
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Court Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Case No. 4:18-cv-07669-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR FILING OF RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE