Navigators Specialty Insurance Company v. Depomed, Inc.
Filing
71
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. STIPULATED 70 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2020)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598
SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
11
SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
ANTHONY B. LEUIN (Bar #95639)
aleuin@sflaw.com
ROEY Z. RAHMIL (Bar #273803)
rrahmil@sflaw.com
One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3598
Telephone:
(415) 421-6500
Facsimile:
(415) 421-2922
MASLON LLP
MARGARET S. BROWNELL (MN Bar #307324) (pro hac vice)
margo.brownell@maslon.com
BRYAN R. FREEMAN (MN Bar #0387154) (pro hac vice)
bryan.freeman@maslon.com
JUDAH A. DRUCK (MN Bar #0397764) (pro hac vice)
judah.druck@maslon.com
3300 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-4140
Telephone:
(612) 672-8200
Facsimile:
(612) 672-8397
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant
DEPOMED, INC. n/k/a ASSERTIO THERAPEUTICS, INC.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
18
Plaintiff and CounterDefendant,
19
20
21
22
23
v.
DEPOMED, INC. n/k/a ASSERTIO
THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
Case No. 4:19-cv-00255-HSG
STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS
WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS
FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; ORDER
[LOCAL RULE 7-11]
Defendant and
Counterclaimant.
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.
4:19-cv-00255-HSG
-1STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE
PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, Defendant and Cross-Complainant Depomed Inc., n/k/a
2
Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. (“Depomed”) hereby moves for an order enlarging page limits with
3
respect to the parties’ forthcoming Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on the Duty to
4
Defend. This administrative motion is stipulated, as set forth on the accompanying Stipulation
5
and [Proposed] Order. The parties request:
6
1. That Depomed be granted ten (10) additional pages for its Motion, such that its
7
page limitation would be thirty-five (35) pages;
8
2. That Plaintiff Navigators Specialty Insurance Company (“Navigators”) be granted
9
ten (10) additional pages for its Response to the Motion and Cross-Motion, such
10
that its page limitation would be forty (40) pages;
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598
SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
11
3. That Depomed be granted an additional five (5) pages for its Reply in support of
12
its Motion and Opposition to Navigators’ Cross-Motion, such that its page
13
limitation would be twenty-five (25) pages; and
14
4. That Navigators be granted an additional five (5) pages for its Reply in support of
15
its Cross-Motion, such that its page limitation would be twenty (20) pages.
16
Good cause exists to enlarge the page limits with respect to the Cross-Motions. First,
17
because the papers will address both Depomed’s Motion and Navigators’ Cross-Motion, it is
18
appropriate and efficient for the parties to have additional pages to address all issues that are
19
raised. Second, while each party believes that the facts relevant to its Motion or Cross-Motion
20
are undisputed, the underlying facts are nevertheless complex, and concern three insurance
21
policies, 182 underlying lawsuits, construction of various policy provisions, and whether
22
Depomed provided notice to Navigators within the relevant policy periods. The additional pages
23
are requested in order to address these issues thoroughly.
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
Case No.
4:19-cv-00255-HSG
-1STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE
PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
1
//
2
For the foregoing reasons, Depomed respectfully requests that the Court grant this
3
administrative motion and enlarge the parties’ page limits as set forth in the accompanying
4
Stipulation and Proposed Order.
5
DATED: March 11, 2020
MASLON LLP
By:
7
8
Attorney for Defendant and Counter-Claimant
DEPOMED, INC. n/k/a ASSERTIO
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
9
d S. G
H a y wo o
J u d ge
ER
illiam J
18
A
17
r.
LI
16
UNIT
ED
15
H
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598
14
RT
SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
DATED: 3/12/2020
D
DENIE
NO
12
RT
U
O
S
11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
10
13
/s/ Margaret S. Brownell
Margaret S. Brownell
FO
6
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.
4:19-cv-00255-HSG
-2STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE
PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?