Navigators Specialty Insurance Company v. Depomed, Inc.

Filing 71

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. STIPULATED 70 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2020)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP 11 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP ANTHONY B. LEUIN (Bar #95639) aleuin@sflaw.com ROEY Z. RAHMIL (Bar #273803) rrahmil@sflaw.com One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3598 Telephone: (415) 421-6500 Facsimile: (415) 421-2922 MASLON LLP MARGARET S. BROWNELL (MN Bar #307324) (pro hac vice) margo.brownell@maslon.com BRYAN R. FREEMAN (MN Bar #0387154) (pro hac vice) bryan.freeman@maslon.com JUDAH A. DRUCK (MN Bar #0397764) (pro hac vice) judah.druck@maslon.com 3300 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-4140 Telephone: (612) 672-8200 Facsimile: (612) 672-8397 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant DEPOMED, INC. n/k/a ASSERTIO THERAPEUTICS, INC. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 18 Plaintiff and CounterDefendant, 19 20 21 22 23 v. DEPOMED, INC. n/k/a ASSERTIO THERAPEUTICS, INC., Case No. 4:19-cv-00255-HSG STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER [LOCAL RULE 7-11] Defendant and Counterclaimant. Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:19-cv-00255-HSG -1STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, Defendant and Cross-Complainant Depomed Inc., n/k/a 2 Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. (“Depomed”) hereby moves for an order enlarging page limits with 3 respect to the parties’ forthcoming Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on the Duty to 4 Defend. This administrative motion is stipulated, as set forth on the accompanying Stipulation 5 and [Proposed] Order. The parties request: 6 1. That Depomed be granted ten (10) additional pages for its Motion, such that its 7 page limitation would be thirty-five (35) pages; 8 2. That Plaintiff Navigators Specialty Insurance Company (“Navigators”) be granted 9 ten (10) additional pages for its Response to the Motion and Cross-Motion, such 10 that its page limitation would be forty (40) pages; ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP 11 3. That Depomed be granted an additional five (5) pages for its Reply in support of 12 its Motion and Opposition to Navigators’ Cross-Motion, such that its page 13 limitation would be twenty-five (25) pages; and 14 4. That Navigators be granted an additional five (5) pages for its Reply in support of 15 its Cross-Motion, such that its page limitation would be twenty (20) pages. 16 Good cause exists to enlarge the page limits with respect to the Cross-Motions. First, 17 because the papers will address both Depomed’s Motion and Navigators’ Cross-Motion, it is 18 appropriate and efficient for the parties to have additional pages to address all issues that are 19 raised. Second, while each party believes that the facts relevant to its Motion or Cross-Motion 20 are undisputed, the underlying facts are nevertheless complex, and concern three insurance 21 policies, 182 underlying lawsuits, construction of various policy provisions, and whether 22 Depomed provided notice to Navigators within the relevant policy periods. The additional pages 23 are requested in order to address these issues thoroughly. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 Case No. 4:19-cv-00255-HSG -1STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 // 2 For the foregoing reasons, Depomed respectfully requests that the Court grant this 3 administrative motion and enlarge the parties’ page limits as set forth in the accompanying 4 Stipulation and Proposed Order. 5 DATED: March 11, 2020 MASLON LLP By: 7 8 Attorney for Defendant and Counter-Claimant DEPOMED, INC. n/k/a ASSERTIO THERAPEUTICS, INC. 9 d S. G H a y wo o J u d ge ER illiam J 18 A 17 r. LI 16 UNIT ED 15 H ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598 14 RT SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP DATED: 3/12/2020 D DENIE NO 12 RT U O S 11 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 10 13 /s/ Margaret S. Brownell Margaret S. Brownell FO 6 N D IS T IC T R OF C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:19-cv-00255-HSG -2STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?