State of California et al v. Trump et al

Filing 107

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 98 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Leave to File Memorandum of 58 Religious Organizations as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2019)

Download PDF
1 PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP 2 Steven A. Zalesin (pro hac vice admission pending) Adeel A. Mangi (pro hac vice admission pending) Zachary Kolodin (pro hac vice admission pending) Amir Badat (pro hac vice admission pending) 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-6710 Tel: (212) 336-2000 Fax: (212) 336-2222 3 4 5 6 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP 7 10 Gary T. Lafayette (SBN 088666) Brian H. Chun (SBN 215417) 1300 Clay Street, Suite 810 Oakland, CA 94612 Tel: (415) 357-4600 Fax: (415) 357-4605 11 Attorneys for Amici Curiae 58 Religious Organizations 8 9 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiffs, vs. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, et al., Defendants. Case No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONSENT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MEMORANDUM OF 58 RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Date: Time: 05/17/2019 10:00 AM 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE 19-cv-00872-HSG 1 2 3 Upon consideration of the motion of 58 Religious Organizations for leave to file as amici curiae in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Counsel is directed to file the amici curiae brief of 58 Religious 4 Organizations on the docket in this matter. 5 6 7 Dated: 5/2/2019 _ Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE 19-cv-00872-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?