State of California et al v. Trump et al
Filing
174
SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions due by 6/12/2019; Responses due by 6/19/2019 and Replies due by 6/24/2019. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/7/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
SCHEDULING ORDER
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
Defendants.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 19-cv-00872-HSG
12
13
SIERRA CLUB, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
Case No. 19-cv-00892-HSG
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
Defendants.
18
19
On May 31, 2019, the parties submitted proposed schedules for briefing motions and cross-
20
motions for summary judgment. See Case No. 19-cv-00872-HSG, Dkt. No. 169. Having
21
considered the parties’ proposals, the Court SETS the following deadlines pursuant to Federal
22
Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:
23
24
25
26
27
28
Event
Plaintiffs’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment/Permanent Injunction
Concerning Sections 284 and 8005
Date
June 12, 2019
Defendants’ Oppositions
June 19, 2019
Plaintiffs’ Replies
June 24, 2019
Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary Judgment on all other issues
July 11, 2019
Defendants’ Oppositions to Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary Judgment and
Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment
July 25, 2019
August 8, 2019
3
Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to Defendants’ Cross-Motions for Summary
Judgment and Replies in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary
Judgment
4
Defendants’ Replies in Support of Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment
August 15, 2019
5
Hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary Judgment and Defendants’
Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment
August 29, 2019
at 2:00 p.m.
1
2
6
7
Plaintiffs’ motions for partial summary judgment/permanent injunction on the Section 284
8
and 8005 issues will be deemed submitted upon the completion of briefing. The Court will notify
9
the parties if a hearing is necessary.
As discussed at the June 5, 2019 case management conference, given (1) the expedited
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ motions for partial summary judgment, which will address all
12
matters presented in the pending motions for preliminary injunction, and (2) Defendants’
13
representation that no border barrier construction in dispute in the pending motions for preliminary
14
injunction will commence before July 1, 2019, the Court holds the pending motions in abeyance.
15
See Case No. 19-cv-00872-HSG, Dkt. No. 167; Case No. 19-cv-00892-HSG, Dkt. No. 150. No
16
further briefing is necessary on those motions.
17
These dates may only be altered by order of the Court and only upon a showing of good
18
cause. The parties are directed to review and comply with this Court’s Civil Pretrial and Trial
19
Standing Order.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 6/7/2019
22
23
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?