State of California et al v. Trump et al

Filing 209

JOINT STATUS REPORT Proposing Briefing Schedule For Summary Judgment Motions on Claims Related to 10 U.S.C. § 2808 by Department of Defense, David Bernhardt, Mark T. Esper, Kevin K. McAleenan, Ryan D. McCarthy, Steven T. Mnuchin, Richard V. Spencer, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Treasury, United States of America, Heather Wilson. and all Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Warden, Andrew) (Filed on 9/13/2019) Modified on 9/16/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

1
2
3
4

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

5
6
7
8

v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
Defendants.

9

12

SIERRA CLUB, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

13
v.

14
15

[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS ON
CLAIMS RELATED TO 10 U.S.C. § 2808
Judge: Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Trial Date:
None Set
Action Filed: February 18, 2019

10
11

No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG
No. 4:19-cv-00892-HSG

Plaintiffs,

DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Upon consideration of the parties’ stipulation submitted on September 13, 2019, and for
good cause shown, the Court hereby orders:
(1)

On September 16, 2019, Defendants will file an administrative record regarding the

Secretary of Defense’s decision to authorize eleven border barrier projects in California,
Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2808.
(2)

Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is due on October __, 2019. Plaintiffs’ motion

for summary judgment shall be no more than 35 pages.

27
28
State of California, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00872-HSG – Order re: § 2808 Schedule
Sierra Club et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00892-HSG – Order re: § 2808 Schedule
1

1

(3)

Defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment and opposition is due on October 25,

2

2019. Defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment and opposition shall be no more than 35

3

pages.

4

(4)

5

Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment is due on November 1, 2019. Plaintiffs’ reply

6

in support of their motion for summary judgment and opposition to Defendants’ cross-motion

7

for summary judgment shall be no more than 25 pages.

8

(5)

9

judgment. If needed, Defendants’ reply in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment

Plaintiffs’ reply in support of their motion for summary judgment and opposition to

Defendants reserve the right to file a reply in support of their cross-motion for summary

10

is due on November 8, 2019. Defendants’ reply in support of their cross-motion for summary

11

judgment shall be no more than 25 pages.

12

(5)

13

_______________________.

The hearing on the motions for summary judgment is set for

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
17
18

DATED:

September __, 2019

______________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
State of California, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00872-HSG – Order re: § 2808 Schedule
Sierra Club et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00892-HSG – Order re: § 2808 Schedule
2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28