State of California et al v. Trump et al
Filing
76
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting (Docket Nos. 74 in case 4:19-cv-00872-HSG and 48 in case 4:19-cv-00892-HSG) Joint Administrative Motion for Relief from Automatic Referral to the ADR Multi-Option Program. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
OAKLAND DIVISION
7
8
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.;
9
10
11
12
13
v.
ORDER ON JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE
RELIEF FROM
Plaintiffs, MOTION FORREFERRAL TO THE ADR
AUTOMATIC
MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official
capacity as President of the United States of
America, et al.;
Defendants.
Case No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG
14
15
16
17
18
19
SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN
BORDER COMMUNITIES COALITION,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the
United States, in his official capacity, et al.;
Defendants.
Case No. 4-19-cv-00892-HSG
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order on Joint Admin. Mot. for Relief from Automatic Referral to ADR Multi-Option Program
(4:19-cv-00872-HSG; 4:19-cv-99892-HSG)
1
The parties have filed a Joint Administrative Motion for Relief from Automatic Referral
2
to the ADR Multi-Option Program. Having considered the parties’ motion and all materials
3
submitted in relation thereto, and good cause having been shown,
4
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS THEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Administrative Motion for Relief
from Automatic Referral to the ADR Multi-Option Program is GRANTED;
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties be, and they hereby are, excused from
mandatory participation in the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Multi-Option Program.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 22, 2019
__________________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Order on Joint Admin. Mot. for Relief from Automatic Referral to ADR Multi-Option Program
(4:19-cv-00872-HSG; 4:19-cv-99892-HSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?