State of California et al v. Trump et al

Filing 76

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting (Docket Nos. 74 in case 4:19-cv-00872-HSG and 48 in case 4:19-cv-00892-HSG) Joint Administrative Motion for Relief from Automatic Referral to the ADR Multi-Option Program. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OAKLAND DIVISION 7 8 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.; 9 10 11 12 13 v. ORDER ON JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM Plaintiffs, MOTION FORREFERRAL TO THE ADR AUTOMATIC MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, et al.; Defendants. Case No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG 14 15 16 17 18 19 SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN BORDER COMMUNITIES COALITION, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, in his official capacity, et al.; Defendants. Case No. 4-19-cv-00892-HSG 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order on Joint Admin. Mot. for Relief from Automatic Referral to ADR Multi-Option Program (4:19-cv-00872-HSG; 4:19-cv-99892-HSG) 1 The parties have filed a Joint Administrative Motion for Relief from Automatic Referral 2 to the ADR Multi-Option Program. Having considered the parties’ motion and all materials 3 submitted in relation thereto, and good cause having been shown, 4 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS THEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Administrative Motion for Relief from Automatic Referral to the ADR Multi-Option Program is GRANTED; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties be, and they hereby are, excused from mandatory participation in the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Multi-Option Program. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 22, 2019 __________________________________ The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Order on Joint Admin. Mot. for Relief from Automatic Referral to ADR Multi-Option Program (4:19-cv-00872-HSG; 4:19-cv-99892-HSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?