In re Lyft Inc. Securities Litigation

Filing 113

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 112 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule on Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2021)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Matthew Rawlinson (SBN 231890) 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, California 94025 T: (650) 328-4600 / F: (650) 463-2600 matthew.rawlinson@lw.com Elizabeth Deeley (SBN 230798) 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111 T: (415) 391-0600 / F: (415) 395-8095 elizabeth.deeley@lw.com Andrew B. Clubok (pro hac vice) Susan E. Engel (pro hac vice) 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20004 T: (202) 637-2200 / F: (202) 637-2201 andrew.clubok@lw.com susan.engel@lw.com Colleen C. Smith (SBN 231216) 12670 High Bluff Drive San Diego, California 92130 T: (858) 523-5400 / F: (858) 523-5450 colleen.smith@lw.com 17 Attorneys for Defendants Lyft, Inc., Logan Green, John Zimmer, Brian Roberts, Prashant (Sean) Aggarwal, Ben Horowitz, Valerie Jarrett, David Lawee, Hiroshi Mikitani, Ann Miura-Ko, and Mary Agnes (Maggie) Wilderotter and NonParty Jonathan Christodoro 18 Additional Counsel on Signature Page 15 16 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 20 21 22 In re LYFT INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 23 This Document Relates to: 24 ALL ACTIONS 25 MASTER FILE NO. 4:19-CV-02690-HSG JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIP. AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE Lead Case No. 4:19-cv-02690-HSG 1 Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Defendants Lyft, Inc., Logan Green, John Zimmer, 2 Brian Roberts, Prashant (Sean) Aggarwal, Jonathan Christodoro, Ben Horowitz, Valerie Jarrett, 3 David Lawee, Hiroshi Mikitani, Ann Miura-Ko, and Mary Agnes Wilderotter (the “Lyft 4 Defendants”) and Lead Plaintiff, Rick Keiner (“Plaintiff”, and together with the Lyft Defendants, 5 the “Parties”), through their counsel, submit the following Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 6 To Extend Briefing Schedule on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification. 7 8 9 10 WHEREAS, on September 25, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Class Certification (ECF No. 98); WHEREAS, the Lyft Defendants’ Opposition to the Motion for Class Certification (the “Opposition”) was originally due to be filed on October 9, 2020; 11 WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to extend the date for the Opposition from October 9, 2020 12 to January 12, 2021 and the date for Plaintiff’s Reply in support of his Motion for Class 13 Certification (the “Reply”) from October 16, 2020 to January 22, 2021 (ECF No. 100); 14 WHEREAS, this Court entered the stipulation as an order of the Court on October 13, 2020 15 and set a date for hearing on the Motion for Class Certification for February 18, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. 16 (ECF No. 102); 17 18 WHEREAS, on December 29, 2020 the Court rescheduled the date for a hearing on the Motion for Class Certification to March 11, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. (ECF No. 105); 19 WHEREAS, in light of what the Lyft Defendants believe to be the complex issues involved 20 in the Motion for Class Certification and to accommodate the Lyft Defendants’ request for 21 adequate time for addressing these issues and for briefing and for Plaintiff to have adequate time 22 to respond, counsel for the Parties have met and conferred, and agree to extend the date for the 23 Opposition from January 12, 2021 to January 19, 2021 and the date for Plaintiff’s Reply from 24 January 22, 2021 to February 5, 2021; 25 26 WHEREAS, this extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order; 27 WHEREAS, this stipulation is not intended to operate as an admission of any factual 28 allegation or legal conclusion and is submitted subject to and without waiver of any right, defense, ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 2 JOINT STIP. AND PO TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHED. ON PLAINTFF’S MOT. FOR CLASS CER Lead Case No. 4:19-cv-02690-HSG 1 affirmative defense, or objection; 2 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the Parties hereby stipulate, 3 subject to Court approval, that the briefing schedule for the Motion for Class Certification will be 4 modified as follows: 5 6 1. The Lyft Defendants shall file their Opposition to the Motion for Class Certification by January 19, 2021. 7 2. Plaintiff shall file a Reply in support of his Motion for Class Certification by 8 February 5, 2021. 9 10 Stipulated and agreed to by: 11 Date: January 6, 2021 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 BLOCK & LEVITON LLP LATHAM & WATKINS LLP /s/ Jacob A. Walker Jacob A. Walker (CA Bar. No. 271217) 260 Franklin Street, Suite 1860 Boston, MA 02110 jake@blockesq.com /s/ Colleen C. Smith Colleen C. Smith (CA Bar. No. 231216) 12670 High Bluff Drive San Diego, CA 92130 Colleen.Smith@lw.com Lead Counsel and Counsel for Plaintiff Matthew Rawlinson (CA Bar. No. 231890) 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 T: (650) 328-4600 / F: (650) 463-2600 matthew.rawlinson@lw.com 19 20 Elizabeth Deeley (CA Bar. No. 230798) 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 T: (415) 391-0600 / F: (415) 395-8095 elizabeth.deeley@lw.com 21 22 23 Andrew B. Clubok (pro hac vice) Susan E. Engel (pro hac vice) 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20004 T: (202) 637-2200 / F: (202) 637-2201 andrew.clubok@lw.com susan.engel@lw.com 24 25 26 27 Counsel for Defendants Lyft, Inc., Logan Green, John Zimmer, Brian Roberts, 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 3 JOINT STIP. AND ORDER TO EXTEND SCHED. ON PLAINTFF’S MOT. FOR CLASS CERT. BRIEFING Case No. 4:19-cv-02690-HSG 1 Prashant Aggarwal, Jonathan Christodoro, Ben Horowitz, Valerie Jarrett, David Lawee, Hiroshi Mikitani, Ann Miura-Ko, and Mary Agnes Wilderotter 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 4 JOINT STIP. AND ORDER TO EXTEND SCHED. ON PLAINTFF’S MOT. FOR CLASS CERT. BRIEFING Case No. 4:19-cv-02690-HSG 1 2 3 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil L. R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from all of the signatories above. 4 5 Dated: January 6, 2021 6 /s/Colleen C. Smith Colleen C. Smith * * * 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 Date: 1/7/2021 _______________________________ HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 5 JOINT STIP. AND PO TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHED. ON PLAINTFF’S MOT. FOR CLASS CERT. Case No. 4:19-cv-02690-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?