Vigdorchik v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al

Filing 25

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 24 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2020)

1
2
3
4
5

Bennett M. Cohen, Esq. (State Bar No. 98065)
Law Office Of Bennett M. Cohen, PC
1438 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone [phone]; Fax [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for PLAINTIFF NATALYA VIGDORCHIK

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

OAKLAND DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

NATALYA VIGDORCHIK,

Case No. 4:19-cv-03891-HSG

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
ORDER [FRCP 41(a)]

vs.
Judge: Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
OF BOSTON, WELLS FARGO &
COMPANY GROUP DISABILITY INCOME
PLAN,
Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23

Plaintiff Natalya Vigdorchik, Defendant Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, and
Defendant Wells Fargo & Company Long-Term Disability Plan erroneously sued as Wells Fargo
& Company Group Disability Income Plan, hereby stipulate under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that this action be dismissed with prejudice as to all claims, causes of
action and parties, with each party bearing that party’s own attorney’s fees and costs.

24
25
26
27
28

1
______________________________________________
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER[FRCP 41(A)]; Case No. 4:19-cv-03891-HSG

1

Dated: September 1, 2020

LAW OFFICE OF BENNET M. COHEN, PC
By: /s/ Bennett M. Cohen
BENNETT M. COHEN, Attorney for Plaintiff
NATALYA VIGDORCHIK

2
3
4
5

Dated: September 1, 2020

6

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY
By: /s/ Blake J. Russum
BLAKE J. RUSSUM
Attorneys for Defendants,
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
OF BOSTON; WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN
erroneously sued as WELLS FARGO &
COMPANY GROUP DISABILITY INCOME
PLAN

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

ATTESTATION
I, Bennett M. Cohen, attest that the concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation of
Dismissal [FRCP 41(a)] has been obtained from the other signatory herein.

15
16

Dated: September 1, 2020

LAW OFFICE OF BENNET M. COHEN, PC
By: /s/ Bennett M. Cohen
BENNETT M. COHEN, Attorney for Plaintiff
NATALYA VIGDORCHIK

17
18
19

ORDER

20
21
22

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING and based on the STIPULATION of the parties, this case
is ordered dismissed with prejudice.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: September 14, 2020
By: ________________________________
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
2
______________________________________________
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER[FRCP 41(A)]; Case No. 4:19-cv-03891-HSG