Apple Inc. v. IXI IP, LLC et al

Filing 95

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting (Docket Nos. 94 in case 4:19-cv-06769-HSG and 77 in case 4:19-cv-06773-HSG) Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Apple and Samsung's Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2020)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Jason D. Cassady (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Hamad M. Hamad (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Daniel R. Pearson (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
R. Seth Reich, Jr. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
CALDWELL CASSADY CURRY, PC
2121 N. Pearl Street, Suite 1200
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: [phone]

8
9
10
11

John V. Picone III, Bar No. 187226
[e-mail]
HOPKINS & CARLEY
P.O. Box 1469
San Jose, CA 95109-1469
Telephone: [phone]

12
13

Attorneys for Defendants
IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. and IXI IP, LLC

14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

15
16

APPLE INC.,
Plaintiff,

17
18

v.

19

IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. and IXI IP, LLC.,

20

Defendants.
________________________________________
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 4:19-cv-06769-HSG (Lead Case)
Case No. 4:20-cv-04050-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME TO RESPOND TO APPLE AND
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO STAY
PENDING REEXAMINATION

Case No. 4:19-cv-06773-HSG (Lead Case)
Case No. 4:20-cv-04047-HSG

v.
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. And IXI IP, LLC.,
Defendants.

26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY
PENDING REEXAMINATION

CASE NO. 4:19-CV-06769-HSG
CASE NO. 4:19-CV-06773-HSG

1

Pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Civil L.R. 7-12, Defendants IXI

2

Mobile (R&D) Ltd. and IXI IP, LLC. (“IXI”), and Plaintiffs Apple Inc. (“Apple”), Samsung Electronics

3

Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”), through their respective attorneys, hereby

4

stipulate as follows:

5

Apple and Samsung filed their Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination (the “Motion to Stay”) on

6

October 23, 2020. Dkt. No. 93. IXI’s deadline to respond to the Motion to Stay is currently set for

7

Friday, November 6, 2020, and Apple and Samsung’s deadline to reply is set for Friday, November 13,

8

2020. IXI’s trial counsel, including lead counsel, was in trial for VirnetX, Inc. v. Apple, Civil Action No.

9

6:12-CV-855-RWS. Apple and Samsung are set to serve invalidity contentions on November 24, 2020,

10

and November 26, 2020 is the Thanksgiving holiday. The parties have met and conferred and have

11

agreed to a 10-day extension of time for Defendants to respond to Apple and Samsung’s Motion to Stay

12

Pending Reexamination and a reciprocal 7-day extension of time for Apple and Samsung to reply. As a

13

result, Apple and Samsung’s deadline to reply to IXI’s Response to Apple’s and Samsung’s Motion to

14

Stay Pending Reexamination is November 30, 2020. This extension will not affect any other deadlines in

15

the Court’s schedule, or the hearing requested by Apple and Samsung on January 28, 2021. The Parties

16

previously stipulated on August 24, 2020 a four-day extension in time for IXI to respond to and

17

Samsung’s Complaints for Declaratory Judgment of Noninfringement and Invalidity. The extension

18

allowed for IXI Mobile (R&D) Ltd. to file its answer on the same day as IXI IP, LLC. This previous

19

stipulation did not modify any other dates or deadlines in this case.

20

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT the deadline to

21

respond to Apple and Samsung’s Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination is November 16, 2020, and

22

Apple and Samsung’s deadline for reply is November 30, 2020.

23
24

Dated: November 3, 2020

Respectfully submitted,

25
26

CALDWELL CASSADY CURRY PC.

27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY
PENDING REEXAMINATION
2

CASE NO. 4:19-CV-06769-HSG
CASE NO. 4:19-CV-06773-HSG

1

By: /s/ Jason D. Cassady_______
Jason D. Cassady
Attorneys for Defendants
IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD. and IXI IP, LLC

2
3
4

DESMARAIS LLP

5

By: /s/ Ameet A. Modi________
Ameet A. Modi
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

6
7
8

KIRKLAND ELLIS

9

By: /s/ Todd M. Friedman______
Todd M. Freidman
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

10
11
12
13
14
15

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i)(3), the undersigned attests that all parties have
concurred in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order.

16
Dated: November 3, 2020

CALDWELL CASSADY CURRY PC

17
18

/s/ Jason D. Cassady________
Jason D. Cassady

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY
PENDING REEXAMINATION
3

CASE NO. 4:19-CV-06769-HSG
CASE NO. 4:19-CV-06773-HSG

1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 DATE:11/6/2020
3

_____________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY
PENDING REEXAMINATION
4

CASE NO. 4:19-CV-06769-HSG
CASE NO. 4:19-CV-06773-HSG