WhatsApp Inc. et al v. NSO Group Technologies Limited et al
Filing
217
ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 164 , 176 , 179 , 181 , 184 , 185 , 188 , 191 , 195 , 197 , 198 , 200 , 202 , 205 , 209 , 212 , 214 motions to seal, setting hearing on 186 motion for protective order and 215 motion to dismiss (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2023)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
WHATSAPP INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES
LIMITED, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 19-cv-07123-PJH
ORDER RE MOTIONS TO SEAL;
SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MOTION
TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 164, 176, 179, 181, 184,
185, 188, 191, 193, 195, 197, 198, 200,
202, 205, 209, 212, 214
13
14
The parties in the above-captioned case have filed a number of motions to seal
15
various briefs, declarations, and exhibits. See Dkt. 164, 176, 179, 181, 184, 185, 188,
16
191, 193, 195, 197, 198, 200, 202, 205, 209, 212, 214. The underlying basis for each
17
motion is the same, and is related to the parties’ attempt to comply with orders issued by
18
an Israeli court. Based on the representations made in the supporting declarations, the
19
court concludes that the parties’ claimed basis for sealing does meet the “good cause”
20
standard applicable at this stage of the litigation, and thus, the motions to seal are
21
GRANTED. At a later stage of the litigation, the court will re-evaluate whether continued
22
sealing is warranted under the “compelling reasons” standard. See Ctr. For Auto Safety
23
v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096-97 (9th Cir. 2016).
24
Defendants have also filed a motion for protective order, as well as a motion to
25
dismiss. The motion to dismiss was set for hearing on October 26, 2023, but due to the
26
court’s unavailability on that day, the court hereby advances the hearing to October 19,
27
2023, at 10:00 a.m. The hearing will be held in person, and the court will hear arguments
28
1
on both the motion to dismiss and the motion for protective order.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: September 14, 2023
4
5
/s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?