WhatsApp Inc. et al v. NSO Group Technologies Limited et al

Filing 459

ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 455 Administrative Motion. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2024)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 WHATSAPP INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07123-PJH ORDER RE MOTION TO CLOSE HEARING Re: Dkt. 455 Defendants. 12 13 14 Defendants have filed an administrative motion to close the courtroom to the 15 public for the November 7, 2024 hearing on the parties’ cross-motions for summary 16 judgment and plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions. See Dkt. 455. Plaintiffs have filed an 17 opposition to the motion. See Dkt. 458. 18 “Those who seek to maintain the secrecy of documents attached to dispositive 19 motions must meet the high threshold of showing that ‘compelling reasons’ support 20 secrecy.” Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 21 2006). The “compelling reasons” standard is higher than the “good cause” standard 22 applicable to non-dispositive motions. See id. (“It is important to emphasize the 23 difference between the ‘compelling reasons’ standard and the ‘good cause’ standard.”). 24 In connection with past, non-dispositive motions, the court has granted requests to 25 close hearings to the public. However, based on the material presented in the briefs and 26 in the accompanying motions to seal, the court does not believe that closing the 27 courtroom for the November 7 hearing is justified under the applicable “compelling 28 reasons” standard. Accordingly, defendants’ motion to close the courtroom for the 1 November 7 hearing is DENIED. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: November 6, 2024 5 6 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?