Calderon v. Koenig et al
Filing
27
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 26 EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION AND GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE MORE THAN ONE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Case 4:19-cv-07949-HSG Document 27 Filed 11/18/20 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JAVIER CALDERON,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
C. KOENIG, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 19-cv-07949-HSG
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE
MOTION AND GRANTING LEAVE TO
FILE MORE THAN ONE SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION
Re: Dkt. No. 26
12
13
Good cause being shown, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ request for leave to file more
14
than one summary judgment motion and for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion.
15
Dkt. No. 26. By December 31, 2020, Defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment for
16
failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff’s opposition to this motion must be filed with
17
the Court and served upon Defendants no later than 28 days from the date the motion is filed.
18
Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed. The
19
motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on
20
the motion. If the Court denies the motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust
21
administrative remedies, Defendants may file a second motion for summary judgment on the
22
merits.
23
This order terminates Dkt. No. 26.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: 11/18/2020
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?