Qualcomm Incorporated v. Apple Incorporated
Filing
22
Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 5:19-mc-80057-VKD. Signed by Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 3/12/2019. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
APPLE INCORPORATED,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No.19-mc-80057-VKD
ORDER REFERRING CASE AND
REQUEST TO CONSIDER WHETHER
CASES ARE RELATED
Defendant.
12
13
On January 18, 2019, Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) issued a subpoena pursuant
14
15
to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on Intel Incorporated (“Intel”) in connection
16
with a pending action in the Southern District of California (Qualcomm v. Apple Inc., Case No.
17
3:17-cv-02398 (S.D. Cal.)). Dkt. No. 1 at 1. The subpoena required Intel to produce certain
18
documents and things, as well as produce a witness for deposition. Dkt. No. 2, Exh. A. On
19
February 8, 2019, Intel filed a motion to quash the deposition portion of the subpoena in the
20
Northern District of California. The miscellaneous action associated with that motion was
21
assigned to Judge Westmore, Case No. 19-mc-80038 (KAW). Dkt. No. 1 at 2 n.1. On March 6,
22
2019, Qualcomm filed a motion to compel Intel to comply with the document production portion
23
of the same subpoena, and the miscellaneous action associated with that motion was assigned to
24
the undersigned. Dkt. No. 1.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the undersigned refers this action to Judge Westmore
25
26
to consider whether the cases are related.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
///
1
Dated: March 12, 2019
2
3
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
United States Magistrate Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?