Murray v. Lozano

Filing 15

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 14 EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER. Habeas Answer due by 8/27/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

RICKEY PAUL MURRAY,
Petitioner,

8
v.

9
10

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE ANSWER
Re: Dkt. No. 14

J. LOZANO,
Respondent.

11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 20-cv-00471-HSG

12
Good cause being shown, respondent’s request for a second extension of time to file his

13
14

answer to the order to show cause is GRANTED. Dkt. No. 14. Respondent shall file his answer

15

by August 27, 2020. If petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a

16

traverse with the Court and serving it on respondent within thirty (30) days of the date the answer

17

is filed.

18

This order terminates Dkt. No. 14.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: 6/30/2020
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge