Scott v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Filing 31

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 30 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2020)

Download PDF
1 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com 2 William M. Pao (SBN 219846) william@setarehlaw.com 3 Jose Maria D. Patino, Jr. (SBN 270194) jose@setarehlaw.com 4 SETAREH LAW GROUP 315 South Beverly Drive, Suite 315 5 Beverly Hills, California 90212 Telephone (310) 888-7771 6 Facsimile (310) 888-0109 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff SHANTRE SCOTT 8 MARCIE ISOM FITZSIMMONS (SBN 226906) 9 NEDA HEFZI (SBN 323787) GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 10 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 12 misom@grsm.com nhefzi@grsm.com 13 Attorneys for Defendant 14 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 OAKLAND DIVISION 19 20 SHANTRE SCOTT, an individual, Case No. 4:20-CV-01498-HSG 21 Plaintiff, 22 Assigned For All Purposes To The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., Courtroom 2 vs. 23 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., a Texas 24 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 25 Defendants. 26 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Complaint Filed: January 14, 2020 27 28 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ORDER 1 2 The Court, having considered, accepted, and approved the Stipulation for Dismissal 3 between the parties, ORDERS that the entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each 4 party will bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this action, notwithstanding the 5 provision of Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 54(d). 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 DATED: 10 9/14/2020 HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLILAM, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?