Wilson v. City of Walnut Creek et al
Order by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton re: 49 Ex Parte Application.(pjhlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 20-cv-02721-PJH
ORDER RE: EX PARTE
CITY OF WALNUT CREEK, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 49
The court is in receipt of an ex parte application from plaintiff seeking to extend the
deadline to file an opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss. Dkt. 49. On September
29, 2020, the court set a briefing schedule on defendant’s motion to dismiss requiring
plaintiff to file an opposition by October 13, 2020 and defendants to file a reply brief by
October 20, 2020. Plaintiff has had ample time to file an opposition to defendants’ motion
to dismiss, which has been pending since August 3, 2020. Dkt. 34. Rather than filing an
opposition, plaintiff has appealed the court’s previous order and filed the present ex parte
application. Nonetheless, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the court will extend
plaintiff’s deadline to file an opposition. Accordingly, the court SETS the following briefing
schedule. Plaintiff shall file an opposition by October 21, 2020. Defendants may file a
reply by October 28, 2020. No further extension shall be considered absent good cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 14, 2020
/s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?