Smith v. Diaz et al

Filing 28

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 26 DEFENDANTS DUKE, FRANCO, AND TAYLORS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR AN ORDER STAYING THE DEADLINE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021)

Case 4:20-cv-04335-HSG Document 28 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16

C. JAY SMITH, et al.,

v.
R. DIAZ, et al.,

17

4:20-cv-04335-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS
DUKE, FRANCO, AND TAYLOR’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
STAY RESPONSIVE PLEADING
DEADLINE
Defendants.

18
19

Defendant Duke, Franco, and Taylor have moved under Northern District Civil Local

20

Rules 6-3 and 7-11 to stay the deadline for them to file a responsive pleading. Having reviewed

21

the administrative motion to stay the responsive pleading deadline and the declaration of Janet N.

22

Chen in support thereof, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the request:

23

The responsive deadline for Defendants Duke, Franco, and Taylor is stayed until 14 days

24

after the Court rules on the pending (12)(b)(6) motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Diaz, Davis,

25

Feston, Haub, and Bloise.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27

Dated: 7/19/2021

________________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

28
1

Order Granting Defs’ Admin. Mot. to Stay Responsive Pleading Deadline (4:20-cv-04335-HSG)