Smith v. Diaz et al
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 26 DEFENDANTS DUKE, FRANCO, AND TAYLORS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR AN ORDER STAYING THE DEADLINE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021)
Case 4:20-cv-04335-HSG Document 28 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
C. JAY SMITH, et al.,
R. DIAZ, et al.,
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS
DUKE, FRANCO, AND TAYLOR’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
STAY RESPONSIVE PLEADING
Defendant Duke, Franco, and Taylor have moved under Northern District Civil Local
Rules 6-3 and 7-11 to stay the deadline for them to file a responsive pleading. Having reviewed
the administrative motion to stay the responsive pleading deadline and the declaration of Janet N.
Chen in support thereof, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the request:
The responsive deadline for Defendants Duke, Franco, and Taylor is stayed until 14 days
after the Court rules on the pending (12)(b)(6) motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Diaz, Davis,
Feston, Haub, and Bloise.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Order Granting Defs’ Admin. Mot. to Stay Responsive Pleading Deadline (4:20-cv-04335-HSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?