Anderson v. California Department of Correction et al
ORDER REGARDING 23 FILING OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 2/17/2021. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Case 4:20-cv-04368-HSG Document 24 Filed 02/17/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT D. ANDERSON,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 20-cv-04368-HSG
ORDER REGARDING FILING OF
Re: Dkt. No. 23
M. MCGALLON, et al.,
Plaintiff, an inmate at Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”), has filed a pro se action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff recently filed with the Court his requests for admissions
directed at Defendants. Dkt. No. 23. Plaintiff should not file his discovery requests or responses
with the Court. Discovery requests and responses normally are exchanged between the parties
without any copy sent to the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) (listing discovery requests and
responses that “must not” be filed with the court until they are used in the proceeding or the court
orders otherwise). The Court generally is not involved in the discovery process and only becomes
involved when there is a dispute between the parties about discovery responses that they cannot
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?