Official Committee of Tort Claimants v. PG&E Corporation et al
Filing
17
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 15 Stipulation Enlarging Time to File and Word Count of Securities Plaintiffs-Appellants' Reply Brief. Appellant Reply Brief due by 10/26/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020)
1
2 LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
Thomas A. Dubbs (pro hac vice)
3 Carol C. Villegas (pro hac vice)
David J. Goldsmith (pro hac vice)
4 Jeffrey A. Dubbin (SBN 287199)
140 Broadway
5 New York, NY 10005
212-907-0700
6 tdubbs@labaton.com
cvillegas@labaton.com
7 dgoldsmith@labaton.com
jdubbin@labaton.com
8
Lead Counsel for Securities Lead
9 Plaintiff-Appellant PERA and the
Class
10
[Additional counsel listed in
11 signature block]
12
LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
Michael S. Etkin (pro hac vice)
Andrew Behlmann (pro hac vice)
One Lowenstein Drive
Roseland, NJ 07068
973-597-2500
metkin@lowenstein.com
abehlmann@lowenstein.com
MICHELSON LAW GROUP
Randy Michelson (SBN 114095)
220 Montgomery Street, Suite 2100
San Francisco, CA 94104
415-512-8600
randy.michelson@michelsonlawgroup.com
Bankruptcy Counsel for Securities Lead
Plaintiff-Appellant PERA and the Class
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
OAKLAND DIVISION
15
16
17
No. 20-CV-04567 HSG
18
STIPULATION AND
ORDER ENLARGING TIME
TO FILE AND WORD COUNT
OF SECURITIES
PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS’
REPLY BRIEF
In re: PG&E CORPORATION and
19 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
COMPANY,
20
Debtors.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. & ORDER
NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG
On Appeal from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of California, Chapter 11
Case No. 19-30088 (DM) (Lead
Case) (Jointly Administered)
1
WHEREAS:
2
Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico (“PERA”), York
3 County on behalf of the County of York Retirement Fund, City of Warren Police
4 and Fire Retirement System, and Mid-Jersey Trucking Industry & Local No. 701
5 Pension Fund (collectively, “Securities Plaintiffs-Appellants” or “Securities
6 Plaintiffs”), commenced this bankruptcy appeal on July 2, 2020;
7
On September 3, 2020, Securities Plaintiffs filed a principal brief together
8 with a multi-volume appendix (ECF Nos. 4-10);
9
On October 5, 2020, Debtors-Appellees PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
10 and Electric Company filed a brief and an appendix (ECF No. 14);
11
On October 5, 2020, Appellee Official Committee of Tort Claimants
12 (“TCC”) filed a brief and an appendix (ECF Nos. 12-13);
13
Securities Plaintiffs currently have until October 19, 2020 to file a reply
14 brief in further support of this appeal;
15
Because Securities Plaintiffs are replying to appellee briefs of about 23,300
16 words in length combined, Securities Plaintiffs seek an additional seven (7) days,
17 to October 26, 2020, in which to file their reply brief;
18
Similarly, because Securities Plaintiffs are filing a single brief in reply to
19 two appellee briefs, Securities Plaintiffs seek permission to file a reply brief
20 containing an additional 1,400 words, or a total of 7,900 words, consistent with
21 Ninth Circuit Rules 28-5 and 32-2(b);
22
This is the first request for an enlargement of time in this appeal;
23
This is the first request to file a brief exceeding the usual word-count
24 limitation; and
25
Securities Plaintiffs believe the requested enlargement of time will have a
26 negligible, if any, impact on the timeframe for the resolution of this appeal because
27 there is no schedule in place beyond the filing date for reply briefs, and no
28 argument date has been set;
STIP. & ORDER
NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Rules 8015(f)
2 and 9006(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Bankruptcy Local
3 Rule 9006-1(c), as made applicable to this appeal by Civil Local Rule 16-4, by and
4 among Securities Plaintiffs-Appellants, Debtors-Appellees, and Appellee TCC,
5 through their counsel of record, that:
6
1.
Securities Plaintiffs-Appellants shall have an additional seven (7)
7 days, through and including October 26, 2020, to file their reply brief in this
8 bankruptcy appeal.
9
2.
Securities Plaintiffs-Appellants shall have permission to file a reply
10 brief containing no more than 7,900 words, excluding the items listed in
11 Bankruptcy Rule 8015(g).
12
13 Dated: October 13, 2020
Respectfully submitted,
14
LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
By:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
/s/ David J. Goldsmith
Thomas A. Dubbs (pro hac vice)
Carol C. Villegas (pro hac vice)
David J. Goldsmith (pro hac vice)
Jeffrey A. Dubbin (SBN 287199)
140 Broadway
New York, NY 10005
212-907-0700
tdubbs@labaton.com
cvillegas@labaton.com
dgoldsmith@labaton.com
jdubbin@labaton.com
Lead Counsel for Securities Lead
Plaintiff-Appellant PERA and the Class
22
MICHELSON LAW GROUP
Randy Michelson (SBN 114095)
220 Montgomery Street, Suite 2100
San Francisco, CA 94104
415-512-8600
randy.michelson@michelsonlawgroup.com
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. & ORDER
NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG
LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
Michael S. Etkin (pro hac vice)
Andrew Behlmann (pro hac vice)
One Lowenstein Drive
Roseland, NJ 07068
973-597-2500
metkin@lowenstein.com
abehlmann@lowenstein.com
1
2
3
4
5
Bankruptcy Counsel for Securities Lead
Plaintiff-Appellant PERA and the Class
6
11
WAGSTAFFE, VON LOEWENFELDT,
BUSCH & RADWICK, LLP
James M. Wagstaffe (SBN 95535)
Frank Busch (SBN 258288)
100 Pine Street, Suite 725
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-357-8900
wagstaffe@wvbrlaw.com
busch@wvbrlaw.com
12
Liaison Counsel for the Class
13
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
Darren J. Robbins (SBN 168593)
Brian E. Cochran (SBN 286202)
655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101
619-231-1058
darrenr@rgrdlaw.com
bcochran@rgrdlaw.com
7
8
9
10
14
15
16
17
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
Willow E. Radcliffe (SBN 200089)
Kenneth J. Black (SBN 291871)
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
415-288-4545
willowr@rgrdlaw.com
kennyb@rgrdlaw.com
18
19
20
21
22
23
Counsel for Securities Act
Plaintiffs-Appellants
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. & ORDER
NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG
VANOVERBEKE, MICHAUD
& TIMMONY, P.C.
Thomas C. Michaud
79 Alfred Street
Detroit, MI 48201
313-578-1200
tmichaud@vmtlaw.com
1
2
3
4
Additional Counsel for Securities
Act Plaintiffs-Appellants
5
6
7 Dated: October 13, 2020
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
By:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
/s/ Richard W. Slack
Richard W. Slack (pro hac vice)
Theodore E. Tserekides (pro hac vice)
Jessica Liou (pro hac vice)
Matthew Goren (pro hac vice)
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10153-0119
212-310-8000
richard.slack@weil.com
theodore.tserekides@weil.com
jessica.liou@weil.com
matthew.goren@weil.com
19
KELLER BENVENUTTI KIM LLP
Tobias S. Keller (#151445)
Peter J. Benvenutti (#60566)
Jane Kim (#298192)
650 California Street, Suite 1900
San Francisco, CA 94108
415-496-6723
tkeller@kbkllp.com
pbenvenutti@kbkllp.com
jkim@kbkllp.com
20
Attorneys for Debtors-Appellees
15
16
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. & ORDER
NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG
1 Dated: October 13, 2020
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
By:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
/s/ David J. Richardson
Robert Julian
Kimberly Morris
David J. Richardson
Lauren T. Attard
Transamerica Pyramid Center
600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3100
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-659-2600
rjulian@bakerlaw.com
kmorris@bakerlaw.com
drichardson@bakerlaw.com
lattard@bakerlaw.com
Attorneys for Appellee Official
Committee of Tort Claimants
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. & ORDER
NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG
1
E-Filing Attestation
2
I am the ECF user whose user ID and password were utilized to file this
3 document. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that I obtained the
4 concurrence in the filing of this document from each of the other signatories above.
5
/s/ David J. Goldsmith
David J. Goldsmith
6
7
8
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO
ORDERED. Dated: October 14, 2020
11
12
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. & ORDER
NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?