Official Committee of Tort Claimants v. PG&E Corporation et al

Filing 17

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 15 Stipulation Enlarging Time to File and Word Count of Securities Plaintiffs-Appellants' Reply Brief. Appellant Reply Brief due by 10/26/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020)

Download PDF
1 2 LABATON SUCHAROW LLP Thomas A. Dubbs (pro hac vice) 3 Carol C. Villegas (pro hac vice) David J. Goldsmith (pro hac vice) 4 Jeffrey A. Dubbin (SBN 287199) 140 Broadway 5 New York, NY 10005 212-907-0700 6 tdubbs@labaton.com cvillegas@labaton.com 7 dgoldsmith@labaton.com jdubbin@labaton.com 8 Lead Counsel for Securities Lead 9 Plaintiff-Appellant PERA and the Class 10 [Additional counsel listed in 11 signature block] 12 LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP Michael S. Etkin (pro hac vice) Andrew Behlmann (pro hac vice) One Lowenstein Drive Roseland, NJ 07068 973-597-2500 metkin@lowenstein.com abehlmann@lowenstein.com MICHELSON LAW GROUP Randy Michelson (SBN 114095) 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 2100 San Francisco, CA 94104 415-512-8600 randy.michelson@michelsonlawgroup.com Bankruptcy Counsel for Securities Lead Plaintiff-Appellant PERA and the Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 17 No. 20-CV-04567 HSG 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO FILE AND WORD COUNT OF SECURITIES PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF In re: PG&E CORPORATION and 19 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, 20 Debtors. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. & ORDER NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG On Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, Chapter 11 Case No. 19-30088 (DM) (Lead Case) (Jointly Administered) 1 WHEREAS: 2 Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico (“PERA”), York 3 County on behalf of the County of York Retirement Fund, City of Warren Police 4 and Fire Retirement System, and Mid-Jersey Trucking Industry & Local No. 701 5 Pension Fund (collectively, “Securities Plaintiffs-Appellants” or “Securities 6 Plaintiffs”), commenced this bankruptcy appeal on July 2, 2020; 7 On September 3, 2020, Securities Plaintiffs filed a principal brief together 8 with a multi-volume appendix (ECF Nos. 4-10); 9 On October 5, 2020, Debtors-Appellees PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas 10 and Electric Company filed a brief and an appendix (ECF No. 14); 11 On October 5, 2020, Appellee Official Committee of Tort Claimants 12 (“TCC”) filed a brief and an appendix (ECF Nos. 12-13); 13 Securities Plaintiffs currently have until October 19, 2020 to file a reply 14 brief in further support of this appeal; 15 Because Securities Plaintiffs are replying to appellee briefs of about 23,300 16 words in length combined, Securities Plaintiffs seek an additional seven (7) days, 17 to October 26, 2020, in which to file their reply brief; 18 Similarly, because Securities Plaintiffs are filing a single brief in reply to 19 two appellee briefs, Securities Plaintiffs seek permission to file a reply brief 20 containing an additional 1,400 words, or a total of 7,900 words, consistent with 21 Ninth Circuit Rules 28-5 and 32-2(b); 22 This is the first request for an enlargement of time in this appeal; 23 This is the first request to file a brief exceeding the usual word-count 24 limitation; and 25 Securities Plaintiffs believe the requested enlargement of time will have a 26 negligible, if any, impact on the timeframe for the resolution of this appeal because 27 there is no schedule in place beyond the filing date for reply briefs, and no 28 argument date has been set; STIP. & ORDER NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Rules 8015(f) 2 and 9006(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Bankruptcy Local 3 Rule 9006-1(c), as made applicable to this appeal by Civil Local Rule 16-4, by and 4 among Securities Plaintiffs-Appellants, Debtors-Appellees, and Appellee TCC, 5 through their counsel of record, that: 6 1. Securities Plaintiffs-Appellants shall have an additional seven (7) 7 days, through and including October 26, 2020, to file their reply brief in this 8 bankruptcy appeal. 9 2. Securities Plaintiffs-Appellants shall have permission to file a reply 10 brief containing no more than 7,900 words, excluding the items listed in 11 Bankruptcy Rule 8015(g). 12 13 Dated: October 13, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 14 LABATON SUCHAROW LLP By: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 /s/ David J. Goldsmith Thomas A. Dubbs (pro hac vice) Carol C. Villegas (pro hac vice) David J. Goldsmith (pro hac vice) Jeffrey A. Dubbin (SBN 287199) 140 Broadway New York, NY 10005 212-907-0700 tdubbs@labaton.com cvillegas@labaton.com dgoldsmith@labaton.com jdubbin@labaton.com Lead Counsel for Securities Lead Plaintiff-Appellant PERA and the Class 22 MICHELSON LAW GROUP Randy Michelson (SBN 114095) 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 2100 San Francisco, CA 94104 415-512-8600 randy.michelson@michelsonlawgroup.com 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. & ORDER NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP Michael S. Etkin (pro hac vice) Andrew Behlmann (pro hac vice) One Lowenstein Drive Roseland, NJ 07068 973-597-2500 metkin@lowenstein.com abehlmann@lowenstein.com 1 2 3 4 5 Bankruptcy Counsel for Securities Lead Plaintiff-Appellant PERA and the Class 6 11 WAGSTAFFE, VON LOEWENFELDT, BUSCH & RADWICK, LLP James M. Wagstaffe (SBN 95535) Frank Busch (SBN 258288) 100 Pine Street, Suite 725 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-357-8900 wagstaffe@wvbrlaw.com busch@wvbrlaw.com 12 Liaison Counsel for the Class 13 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Darren J. Robbins (SBN 168593) Brian E. Cochran (SBN 286202) 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 619-231-1058 darrenr@rgrdlaw.com bcochran@rgrdlaw.com 7 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Willow E. Radcliffe (SBN 200089) Kenneth J. Black (SBN 291871) Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 415-288-4545 willowr@rgrdlaw.com kennyb@rgrdlaw.com 18 19 20 21 22 23 Counsel for Securities Act Plaintiffs-Appellants 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. & ORDER NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG VANOVERBEKE, MICHAUD & TIMMONY, P.C. Thomas C. Michaud 79 Alfred Street Detroit, MI 48201 313-578-1200 tmichaud@vmtlaw.com 1 2 3 4 Additional Counsel for Securities Act Plaintiffs-Appellants 5 6 7 Dated: October 13, 2020 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP By: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 /s/ Richard W. Slack Richard W. Slack (pro hac vice) Theodore E. Tserekides (pro hac vice) Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119 212-310-8000 richard.slack@weil.com theodore.tserekides@weil.com jessica.liou@weil.com matthew.goren@weil.com 19 KELLER BENVENUTTI KIM LLP Tobias S. Keller (#151445) Peter J. Benvenutti (#60566) Jane Kim (#298192) 650 California Street, Suite 1900 San Francisco, CA 94108 415-496-6723 tkeller@kbkllp.com pbenvenutti@kbkllp.com jkim@kbkllp.com 20 Attorneys for Debtors-Appellees 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. & ORDER NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG 1 Dated: October 13, 2020 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP By: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 /s/ David J. Richardson Robert Julian Kimberly Morris David J. Richardson Lauren T. Attard Transamerica Pyramid Center 600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3100 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-659-2600 rjulian@bakerlaw.com kmorris@bakerlaw.com drichardson@bakerlaw.com lattard@bakerlaw.com Attorneys for Appellee Official Committee of Tort Claimants 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. & ORDER NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG 1 E-Filing Attestation 2 I am the ECF user whose user ID and password were utilized to file this 3 document. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that I obtained the 4 concurrence in the filing of this document from each of the other signatories above. 5 /s/ David J. Goldsmith David J. Goldsmith 6 7 8 9 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 14, 2020 11 12 HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. & ORDER NO. 20-CV-04567 HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?