Xianhua v. Oath Holdings, Inc. f/k/a/Yahoo! Inc., et al

Filing 73

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/12/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2022)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NING XIANHUA, 7 Case No. 20-cv-06185-HSG Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 OATH HOLDINGS, INC., et al., 10 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On March 31, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint and gave Plaintiff leave to 13 14 amend within 21 days. Dkt. No. 70 at 8. Plaintiff indicates he will not amend the complaint, and 15 seeks to appeal the Court’s dismissal order. Dkt. No. 72. 16 17 18 “If a plaintiff has been given leave to amend its complaint, a further district court determination constituting final judgment must be obtained before an appeal may be brought.” United Nat. Ins. Co. v. R&D Latex Corp., 242 F.3d 1102, 1110 (9th Cir. 2001) (quotation omitted) 19 20 21 (simplified); Baldwin v. Sebelius, 654 F.3d 877, 878 (9th Cir. 2011) (“[A] plaintiff who has been given leave to amend may not file a notice of appeal before entry of a final judgment even when 22 he elects to stand on an unamended pleading[.]”). “[A] plaintiff may obtain an appealable final 23 judgment by ‘fil[ing] in writing a notice of intent not to file an amended complaint.’” Edwards v. 24 Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058, 1064 (9th Cir. 2004) (quotation omitted). 25 // 26 // 27 28 // 1 In light of Plaintiff’s notice of intent not to amend, the Court DISMISSES this action with 2 prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6). The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants. Both 3 parties shall bear their own costs of suit. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 4/12/2022 7 8 ________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?