Romero et al v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
Filing
76
Order as Modified by Judge Richard Seeborg for Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 64 MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE OF MINOR'S CLAIM FOR MINOR M. D. ***REDACTED***(bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2022)
1
2
3
4
5
6
CHARLES A. BONNER, ESQ. SB# 85413
A. CABRAL BONNER, ESQ. SB# 247528
LAW OFFICES OF BONNER & BONNER
475 GATE FIVE ROAD, SUITE 211
SAUSALITO, CA 94965
TEL: (415) 331-3070
FAX: (415) 331-2738
cbonner799@aol.com
cabral@bonnerlaw.com
JEFFREY L. MENDELMAN, ESQ. SB#305629
7 CASE LAW LTD.
8 580 CALIFORNIA STREET, FL. 12
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104
9 TEL: (833) 227-3583
FAX: (415) 520-5405
10 admin@caselawltd.com
11
12 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
GERONIMO ROMERO, et al.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
OAKLAND DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Case No. 20-cv-07583-SBA
GERONIMO ROMERO; JESSICA
ROMERO; G.R., Minor by Guardian ad
Litem, GERONIMO ROMERO; J.R.,
Minor by Guardian ad Litem, GERONIMO
ROMERO; McRYAN DAVID; JANICE
DAVID; M.D., Minor by Guardian ad
Litem, JANICE DAVID; BRIANA
JONES; and JOSHUA DAVID,
vs.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
JANICE DAVID'S PETITION FOR
ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE
OF MINOR'S CLAIM FOR
MINOR M. D. AS MODIFIED
Action Filed: Sept. 16, 2020
Notice of Removal Filed: Oct. 28, 2020
Plaintiffs,
HAWAIIAN AIRLINES INC., and DOES
1-50,
Defendants
28
_____________________________________________________________________________
MODIFIED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF JANICE DAVID'S PETITION FOR ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE OF
MINOR'S CLAIM FOR MINOR M.D.
20-cv-07583-SBA
1
1
Plaintiff Janice David, Guardian ad Litem of Minor M.D., petitions this Court for an order
2
approving the compromise of her minor child’s claim against Defendants Hawaiian Airlines Inc.,
3
Raytheon Technologies Corporation, and IAE International Aero Engines AG, for
4
injuries allegedly sustained by Minor M.D. during a flight on August 22, 2019 (the
5
“Incident”). The matter comes to the Court by stipulation of the parties. Having considered the
6
parties’ positions, relevant legal authorities, and the record in the case, the Court hereby
7
APPROVES the compromise of the Minor’s claim against the Defendants.
8
Additionally, the Court Orders as follows:
9
1. Plaintiff Janice David is authorized to execute and convey to the representatives of the
10
Defendants the Full And Final Release Of All Claims, Waiver And Covenant Not To
11
Sue;
12
2. In disbursing the settlement funds, Defendants will issue a check in the amount of
13
$ REDACTED payable to Pacific Life & Annuity Services, Inc. and execute the Qualified
14
Assignment Form, which, upon execution of said form, and tendering of said funds, will
15
serve to fully and forever discharge Defendants’ obligations to Minor M.D. arising from
16
or related to the Incident;
17
3. Within 45 days after the receipt of the settlement funds from the Defendants, Plaintiff
18
Janice David shall provide proof to the Court that $ REDACTED was invested in the
19
structured settlement annuity set forth in Plaintiff’s petition;
20
4. Attorneys for Petitioner and Minor M.D. are awarded $ REDACTED as attorney’s fees to
21
be paid directly to the client trust account for the Law Offices of Charles A. Bonner;
22
5. Within 60 days after the receipt of the settlement funds from Defendants, the parties
23
shall file either: (1) a stipulated dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
24
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); or (2) a joint status report setting forth the reason(s) why the
25
stipulated dismissal with prejudice was not entered.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED
27
28
Dated: 5/10/2022
RS
Richard Seeborg for Saundra B. Armstrong
United States District Judge
_____________________________________________________________________________
MODIFIED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF JANICE DAVID'S PETITION FOR ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE OF
MINOR'S CLAIM FOR MINOR M.D.
20-cv-07583-SBA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?