Pacific Steel Group v. Commercial Metals Company et al

Filing 358

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 357 Stipulation. Motions due by 7/19/2024. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2024)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 OAKLAND DIVISION 4 5 PACIFIC STEEL GROUP, Case No. 4:20-cv-07683-HSG 6 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REVISED JOINT OMNIBUS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL 7 Plaintiff, vs. 8 COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE RE SEALING MOTION Case No. 4:20-cv-07683-HSG The Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Action Filed: Trial Date: October 30, 2020 October 21, 2024 1 2 STIPULATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Pacific Steel Group (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants 3 Commercial Metals Company, CMC Steel Fabricators, Inc., and CMC Steel US, LLC 4 (collectively, “Defendants” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their 5 undersigned counsel, respectfully request that the Court enter the Parties’ below stipulation 6 extending the deadline to file a revised Joint Omnibus Administrative Motion to Seal from July 9, 7 2024 to July 19, 2024. 8 WHEREAS, on April 19, 2024, the Parties filed a Joint Omnibus Administrative Motion to 9 Seal (Dkt. No. 289) pursuant to the Court’s April 10, 2024 Order Regarding Motions to Seal (Dkt. 10 No. 286) directing the parties to file a single administrative motion to seal and proposed order 11 consolidating all motions to seal that were then pending; 12 WHEREAS, on July 2, 2024, the Court directed the Parties to meet and confer and 13 reconsider their sealing requests in light of the “compelling reasons” standard under Kamakana v. 14 City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), and ordered the Parties to file either a 15 revised Joint Omnibus Administrative Motion to Seal that has more narrowly tailored requests for 16 sealing/redactions or a joint statement explaining why the current omnibus motion meets the 17 “compelling reasons” standard (Dkt. No. 354); 18 WHEREAS, on July 2, 2024, counsel for the Parties met and conferred and agreed to file a 19 revised Joint Omnibus Administrative Motion to Seal that more narrowly tailors the Parties’ 20 requests for sealing/redactions to meet the “compelling reasons” standard; 21 WHEREAS, for the convenience of the Court, counsel for the Parties further agreed that 22 the revised Joint Omnibus Administrative Motion to Seal would include any requests for 23 sealing/redactions for information filed in connection with the Parties’ respective motions in 24 limine (Dkt. Nos. 308, 314, 334, 339) which were filed after the Parties’ April 19, 2024 Joint 25 Omnibus Administrative Motion to Seal; 26 WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have begun to confer with their respective clients to 27 more narrowly tailor the Parties’ requests for sealing/redactions to meet the “compelling reasons” 28 standard; STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE RE SEALING MOTION – Case No. 4:20-cv-07683-HSG 1 1 WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have begun to confer with pertinent third parties 2 regarding more narrowly tailoring their requests for sealing/redactions to meet the “compelling 3 reasons” standard; 4 WHEREAS, the Parties, pertinent third parties, and their respective counsel have limited 5 availability prior to July 9, 2024, given scheduling conflicts around the Fourth of July holiday; 6 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend the deadline for filing the revised Joint 7 Omnibus Administrative Motion to Seal to July 19, 2024, to accommodate the Parties’, pertinent 8 third parties’, and their respective counsels’ scheduling conflicts and to provide sufficient time for 9 the Parties and pertinent third parties to review and narrowly tailor their requests for 10 sealing/redactions to meet the “compelling reasons” standard; 11 WHEREAS, no other deadlines will be altered or otherwise impacted by this extension, as 12 set forth in the Declaration of Michelle Kao filed concurrently herewith; and 13 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED that the deadline to file a 14 revised Joint Omnibus Administrative Motion to Seal shall be reset to July 19, 2024. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE RE SEALING MOTION Case No. 4:20-cv-07683-HSG 2 1 Dated: July 2, 2024 Dated: July 2, 2024 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 By: /s/ Christopher C. Wheeler Christopher C. Wheeler (SBN 224872) Cameron J. Gibbs (SBN 346524) FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP One Bush Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 cwheeler@fbm.com cgibbs@fbm.com By: /s/ Steven Bizar Steven Bizar (pro hac vice) Agnese Nadalini (pro hac vice) David Costigan (pro hac vice) DECHERT LLP 2929 Arch St. Philadelphia, PA 19104 Telephone: 215.994.4000 Facsimile: 215.994.2222 Email: steven.bizar@dechert.com Email: agnese.nadalini@dechert.com Email: david.costigan@dechert.com Benjamin D. Brown (SBN 202545) Daniel McCuaig (pro hac vice) Nathaniel D. Regenold (pro hac vice) COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 1100 New York Ave., NW, Fifth Floor Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699 bbrown@cohenmilstein.com dmccuaig@cohenmilstein.com nregenold@cohenmilstein.com Shari Ross Lahlou (pro hac vice) Nathan Richardson (pro hac vice) DECHERT LLP 1900 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: 202.261.3300 Facsimile: 202.261.3333 Email: shari.lahlou@dechert.com Email: nathan.richardson@dechert.com Joseph Trujillo (SBN 305170) DECHERT LLP 45 Fremont St., 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: 415.262.4500 Facsimile: 415.262.4555 Email: joseph trujillo@dechert.com William C. Price (SBN 108542) Rachael L. McCracken (SBN 252660) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 williamprice@quinnemanuel.com rachaelmccracken@quinnemanuel.com By: /s/ Bonnie Lau Bonnie Lau (SBN 246188) Lena Gankin (SBN 333047) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Email: blau@mofo.com Steig D. Olson (pro hac vice) Nic Siebert (pro hac vice) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 Telephone: (212) 849-7000 Facsimile: (212) 849-7100 steigolson@quinnemanuel.com nicolassiebert@quinnemanuel.com Attorneys for Defendants Commercial Metals Company; CMC Rebar West; CMC Steel US, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Pacific Steel Group 27 28 STIPULATION &ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE RE SEALING MOTION Case No. 4:20-cv-07683-HSG 3 1 ECF ATTESTATION 2 I, Christopher C. Wheeler, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file 3 this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REVISED 4 JOINT OMNIBUS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5 5-1, concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories, 6 and I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so 7 ordered or for inspection upon request by a party. 8 Dated: July 2, 2024 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 9 10 By: /s/ Christopher C. Wheeler Christopher C. Wheeler 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE RE SEALING MOTION Case No. 4:20-cv-07683-HSG 4 1 2 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO 3 ORDERED. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7/3/2024 The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE RE SEALING MOTION Case No. 4:20-cv-07683-HSG 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?