Ali v. Pasha Hawaii Holdings, LLC
Filing
80
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING 79 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ADVANCE HEARING DATE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2022)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ABDULATAEF ALI,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
v.
PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS, LLC,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO ADVANCE HEARING
DATE
Re: Dkt. No. 79
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 20-cv-08122-HSG
12
13
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to advance the hearing date of its Motion to
14
Strike Defendant’s Witness Greg Johnson. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike essentially alleges that
15
Defendant did not identify Greg Johnson in its initial disclosures or in response to interrogatories,
16
has not produced him for deposition, and has otherwise failed to identify him as a rebuttal expert
17
or a non-retained employee. Dkt. No. 74 at 2-3. It accordingly seeks an order “striking Greg
18
Johnson from Defendant’s witness list and disallow[ing] him from appearing and testifying at
19
trial.” Id. at 5.
20
Although Plaintiff’s motion is styled as a “Motion to Strike,” it is actually a
21
straightforward motion in limine seeking to preclude the testimony of a witness under Federal
22
Rule of Civil Procedure 37. It is therefore untimely. See Civil Pretrial and Trial Standing Order
23
for Cases Before District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. ¶ 24 (“Motions in limine must be filed
24
with the Court no later than 21 days prior to the date set for the Pretrial Conference.”).
25
The Court accordingly DENIES the pending motion to advance the hearing on the Motion
26
to Strike and will resolve Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike as follows: Defendant shall respond to the
27
Motion to Strike by May 12, 2022, after which the Motion will be deemed submitted unless the
28
Court orders otherwise. The motion hearing currently set for November 3, 2022, is VACATED.
1
The Court expects, and will require, all counsel to comply with all rules of civil procedure,
2
standing orders and local rules at all times through the resolution of this case. Counsel should
3
commit to knowing and diligently following those rules.
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 5/6/2022
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?