Johnson v. Alameda County Sheriff Department - Santa Rita Jail

Filing 26

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff shall respond by 1/19/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/7/2022. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
Case 4:20-cv-08283-DMR Document 26 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ETTA JOHNSON, Case No. 20-cv-08283-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendants. 12 13 On November 29, 2021, the court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion to 14 dismiss. [Docket No. 25.] The court granted Plaintiff leave to file her Second Amended 15 Complaint by December 29, 2021. Nothing has been filed. Accordingly, the court orders Plaintiff 16 to respond in writing by January 19, 2022 and explain why this case should not be dismissed for 17 failure to prosecute. She must also file her Second Amended Complaint by that date. Failure to 18 respond by January 19, 2022 may result in dismissal of this action. 19 The court refers Plaintiff to the section “Representing Yourself” on the Court’s website, 20 located at, as well as the Court’s Legal Help Centers for 21 unrepresented parties. Parties may schedule an appointment by calling 415-782-8982 or emailing 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 7, 2022 ______________________________________ Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?