Dames et al v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 20

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 18 Stipulation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2021)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP Jennifer L. Joost (Bar No. 296164) One Sansome Street, Suite 1850 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 400-3000 Fax: (415) 400-3001 jjoost@ktmc.com 5 6 7 8 SONAL N. MEHTA (SBN 222086) Sonal.Mehta@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400 Palo Alto, California 94306 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] Counsel for Plaintiffs DEBORAH DAMES and TIMOTHY MATHEWS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated 9 10 DAVID Z. GRINGER (pro hac vice pending) David.Gringer@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 663-6000 Facsimile: (202) 663-6363 11 Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 OAKLAND DIVISION 16 17 DEBORAH DAMES and TIMOTHY MATHEWS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiffs, Case No. 4:20-cv-08817-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME v. FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation headquartered in California, Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:20-cv-08817-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME 1 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Deborah Dames and Timothy Mathews (“Plaintiffs”) filed the complaint in this action (ECF No. 1) (the “Complaint”) on December 11, 2020; 3 4 WHEREAS, Defendant Facebook, Inc.’s (“Facebook”) response to the Complaint is currently due January 19, 2021; 5 6 WHEREAS, six putative class action lawsuits have been filed against Facebook in this District in recent weeks alleging violations of Section 2 of Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2;1 7 WHEREAS, five of these lawsuits, including this action, are currently the subject of contested 8 motions pending before Judge Freeman to consider whether the cases should be related to Reveal Chat 9 Holdco, LLC v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:20-cv-00393-BLF; 10 WHEREAS, two motions are currently pending before Judge Lucy H. Koh, including one motion 11 considering whether Klein v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:20-cv-08570-LHK, Kupcho v. Facebook, Inc., No. 12 4:20-cv-08815-JSW, Steinberg v. Facebook, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-09130-VC, and Dames v. Facebook, Inc., 13 No. 3:20-cv-08817-HSG should be related, and another considering whether Klein v. Facebook, Inc., No. 14 5:20-cv-08570-LHK and Sherman v. Facebook, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-08721-JSW should be related. 15 ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 7-12, Facebook and Plaintiffs, by and 16 through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that good cause exists to extend Facebook’s 17 time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until the earlier of: (a) March 5, 2021; or (b) the date 18 on which Facebook files a response to the complaints in Klein v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:20-cv-08570-LHK; 19 Sherman v. Facebook, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-08721-JSW; Kupcho v. Facebook, Inc., No. 4:20-cv-08815-JSW; 20 Steinberg v. Facebook, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-09130-VC; or Affilious, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., No. 4:20-cv- 21 09217-KAW, or any other case that Facebook asserts is related to either Reveal Chat, Dames, or any of the 22 above matters. 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 In addition to this action, the actions include: Klein v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:20-cv-08570-LHK; Sherman v. Facebook, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-08721-JSW; Kupcho v. Facebook, Inc., No. 4:20-cv-08815-JSW; Steinberg v. Facebook, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-09130-VC; and Affilious, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., No. 4:20-cv-09217-KAW. Case No. 4:20-cv-08817-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 Dated: January 7, 2021 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 3 By: 4 /s/ Sonal N. Mehta SONAL N. MEHTA 5 Attorney for Defendant Facebook, Inc. 6 7 8 Dated: January 7, 2021 9   10 11 12 13 14             /s/ Jennifer L. Joost KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP Jennifer L. Joost (Bar No. 296164) One Sansome Street, Suite 1850 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 400-3000 Facsimile: (415) 400-3001 jjoost@ktmc.com 22 Joseph H. Meltzer* Terence S. Ziegler* Melissa L. Troutner* Lauren McGinley* KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP 280 King of Prussia Road Radnor, PA 19087 Tel: (610) 667-7706 Fax: (610) 667-7056 jmeltzer@ktmc.com tziegler@ktmc.com mtroutner@ktmc.com lmcginley@ktmc.com 23 *pro hac vice forthcoming 24 Counsel for Plaintiffs DEBORAH DAMES and TIMOTHY MATHEWS and the putative Class 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:20-cv-08817-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME 1 2 3 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby attest that the other signatories have concurred in this filing. 4 5 6 Dated: January 7, 2021 By: /s/ Sonal N. Mehta Sonal N. Mehta 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:20-cv-08817-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Facebook’s time to answer or 3 otherwise respond to the Complaint is enlarged up to and including the earlier of: (a) March 5, 2021; or 4 (b) the date on which Facebook files a response to the complaints in Klein v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:20-cv- 5 08570-LHK; Sherman v. Facebook, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-08721-JSW; Kupcho v. Facebook, Inc., No. 4:20- 6 cv-08815-JSW; Steinberg v. Facebook, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-09130-VC; or Affilious, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., 7 No. 4:20-cv-09217-KAW, or any other case that Facebook asserts is related to either Reveal Chat, Dames, 8 or any of the above matters. 9 10 11 12 DATED: 1/8/2021 By: _________________________ Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:20-cv-08817-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?