Rumble, Inc. v. Google LLC et al
Filing
111
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 110 Stipulation Regarding Case Management. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2024)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
6
7
RUMBLE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:21-cv-00229-HSG
v.
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Judge:
GOOGLE LLC,
Defendant.
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
1
2
Pursuant to the Parties’ Joint Stipulation Regarding Case Management (ECF No. 110), the
Court hereby ORDERS the following:
3
1. Documents produced by Parties and non-Parties from their own files are presumed to be
4
authentic within the meaning of Federal Rule of Evidence 901. Any good-faith objection
5
to a document’s authenticity must be provided with the exchange of objections to intended
6
trial exhibits. If any Party serves a specific good-faith written objection to the document’s
7
authenticity, the presumption of authenticity will no longer apply to that document and the
8
Parties will promptly meet and confer to attempt to resolve any authenticity objection.
9
2. In making disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B)(ii), the
10
Parties need only disclose the materials relied upon by an expert in forming any opinions
11
in his or her report.
12
3. No later than seven days after the service of an expert report by a Party, the Party shall
13
produce to the other Party all materials relied upon in forming the opinions expressed in
14
those expert reports, except for materials that are publicly available or have been previously
15
produced by a Party or non-Party in this matter.
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Date: 6/5/2024
___________________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Case No. 4:21-cv-00229-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?