Harris v. Broomfield et al

Filing 23

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING 21 REQUEST TO ADD DEFENDANT WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO FILING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MAURICE LYDELL HARRIS,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.
CLERIC MUHAMMAD, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 21-cv-00283-HSG
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO ADD
DEFENDANT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
TO FILING SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Re: Dkt. No. 21

12
13

Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), has filed the instant pro se civil

14

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 7, 2022, the Court screened the operative

15

complaint (Dkt. No. 8) and found that it stated cognizable claims against defendants SQSP

16

Muslim cleric Muhammad (K. Fasish) and SQSP Christian chaplain Jackson for violation of the

17

First Amendment’s free exercise clause, the Eighth Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause, and

18

the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. Dkt. No. 13. Plaintiff has requested

19

leave to amend the operative complaint to add as a defendant Chaplain Charles Richey, the

20

community resources manager of the Religious Programs Oversight Unit, Division of Adult

21

Institutions, because Plaintiff has recently determined that Mr. Richey is responsible for requiring

22

the named defendants to issue the religious diet violations that have violated his civil rights. Dkt.

23

No. 21. This motion is DENIED because a plaintiff may not amend a complaint piecemeal by

24

filing letters or motions with the Court adding defendants or claims. The proper way to amend a

25

complaint is to seek leave to file an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court’s denial of

26

Plaintiff’s request to add Mr. Richey as a defendant is without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a motion

27

for leave to file a second amended complaint and attaching a proposed second amended complaint

28

that adds Mr. Richey as a defendant. Plaintiff is cautioned that, as a general rule, an amended

1

complaint supersedes the original complaint. See Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967).

2

Once an amended complaint is filed, the original complaint no longer serves any function in the

3

case. The second amended complaint should therefore include all the defendants that Plaintiff

4

wishes to sue and all the claims he wishes to bring, including the defendants already served and

5

the claims already found cognizable. Plaintiff may not incorporate the prior complaints by

6

reference. Plaintiff is reminded that any request for leave to amend the complaint must be

7

accompanied by a proposed amended complaint, as required by the Northern District Local Rules.

8

N.D. Cal. L.R. 10-1.
This order terminates Dkt. No. 21.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Dated:

8/1/2022
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2