Rutenburg v. Twitter, Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 27 Second Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2021)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

MARIA RUTENBURG,
Plaintiff,

5
6
7
8

v.
TWITTER, INC.,

Case No. 4:21-cv-00548-YGR
ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Re: Dkt. No. 27

Defendant.

9
10

The Court previously dismissed this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Dkt. No.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

21), denied plaintiff Maria Rutenburg’s first motion for leave to file a second amended complaint

12

(Dkt. No. 25), and subsequently entered judgment in this action. (Dkt. No. 26.) Now before the

13

Court is Rutenburg’s second motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, filed post

14

judgment. (Dkt. No. 27.) Having reviewed the motion as well as the docket of this action, the

15

second motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is DENIED.

16

Rutenburg’s second motion is nothing more than an improper motion for reconsideration

17

of the Court’s earlier decisions. (See N.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9.) Specifically, Rutenburg does not

18

demonstrate any (1) material difference now in fact or law, (2) the emergence of new material

19

facts or a change in law occurring after the time of the orders, or (3) a manifest failure of the

20

Court to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments which were previously presented.

21

The second motion is otherwise appropriately denied under the grounds and reasoning previously

22

articulated by the Court in the prior orders. (See Dkt. Nos. 21, 25.)

23

Accordingly, the second motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is DENIED.

24

This Order terminates Docket Number 27.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: June 22, 2021

27
28

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE