Bloom Energy Corporation v. Badger et al
ORDER PERMITTING RESPONDENTS TO SUPPLEMENT THEIR RESPONSE AND PETITIONER TO REPLY TO THE SUPPLEMENT signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2021)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION,
Case No. 21-cv-02154-PJH
RESPONDENTS TO SUPPLEMENT
THEIR RESPONSE AND PETITIONER
TO REPLY TO THE SUPPLEMENT
DWIGHT BADGER, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 23
On July 15, 2021, the court held a case management conference in this action. At
United States District Court
Northern District of California
the conference, counsel for respondents, Andrew Munro (“Counsel Munro”) requested an
opportunity to supplement respondents’ June 9, 2021 response (Dkt. 19) to the petition.
Counsel Munro indicated that such opportunity might serve as a viable substitute for any
purported “counter-petition” or motion to vacate that respondents intended to file in
connection with the arbitration award at issue.
The court GRANTS respondents’ request to file a brief supplementing their June
9, 2021 response. That brief may not exceed fifteen pages. Respondents must file any
supplemental brief within seven days of this order. Petitioner may file a reply to that
supplement within fourteen days of this order. That brief may not exceed ten pages.
The parties should avoid repeating any arguments that they’ve already made in their
As part of its supplemental filing, a party may proffer any additional evidence it
sees fit. The parties should file any such evidence on the docket as attachments (i.e.,
Dkt. #-#) to its respective supplemental brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 16, 2021
/s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?