Bloom Energy Corporation v. Badger et al

Filing 28

ORDER PERMITTING RESPONDENTS TO SUPPLEMENT THEIR RESPONSE AND PETITIONER TO REPLY TO THE SUPPLEMENT signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2021)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION,

5

Petitioner,

6
7

Case No. 21-cv-02154-PJH

v.

ORDER PERMITTING
RESPONDENTS TO SUPPLEMENT
THEIR RESPONSE AND PETITIONER
TO REPLY TO THE SUPPLEMENT

DWIGHT BADGER, et al.,
Respondents.

8

Re: Dkt. No. 23
9
On July 15, 2021, the court held a case management conference in this action. At

11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

the conference, counsel for respondents, Andrew Munro (“Counsel Munro”) requested an

12

opportunity to supplement respondents’ June 9, 2021 response (Dkt. 19) to the petition.

13

Counsel Munro indicated that such opportunity might serve as a viable substitute for any

14

purported “counter-petition” or motion to vacate that respondents intended to file in

15

connection with the arbitration award at issue.

16

The court GRANTS respondents’ request to file a brief supplementing their June

17

9, 2021 response. That brief may not exceed fifteen pages. Respondents must file any

18

supplemental brief within seven days of this order. Petitioner may file a reply to that

19

supplement within fourteen days of this order. That brief may not exceed ten pages.

20

The parties should avoid repeating any arguments that they’ve already made in their

21

existing filings.

22

As part of its supplemental filing, a party may proffer any additional evidence it

23

sees fit. The parties should file any such evidence on the docket as attachments (i.e.,

24

Dkt. #-#) to its respective supplemental brief.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 16, 2021
/s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge