Rutter et al v. Apple Inc.

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 34 Stipulation and Proposed Order. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/31/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2021)

1

David M. Rosenberg-Wohl (Cal. Bar No. 132924)
HERSHENSON ROSENBERG-WOHL,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
3080 Washington St.
San Francisco, CA 94115
[phone]
[e-mail]

ALEXIS A. AMEZCUA (CA SBN 247507)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

8

Patrick C. Cooper (Cal. Bar No. 142349)
(reactivation pending)
WARD & COOPER, LLC
2100 Southbridge Parkway, Suite 645
Birmingham, AL 35209
[phone]
[e-mail]

9

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

2
3
4
5
6
7

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

WILLIAM RUTTER, JACQUELINE TABAS,
Case No. 4:21-cv-04077-HSG
NATASHA GARAMANI, CONNIE TABAS,
TRISTAN YOUNG, KASRA ELIASIEH
STIPULATION AND ORDER
ROBERT BARKER, AND CINDY RUTTER, on CONTINUING INITIAL CMC AND
behalf of themselves and all
HEARING ON MOTION TO
others similarly situated,
DISMISS FROM 12/16/21
Plaintiffs,
Date: December 16, 2021
v.
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Dept.: Courtroom 2 – 4th Floor
APPLE INC., and DOES 1-10,
Judge: Honorable Haywood S.
Gilliam, Jr.
Defendants.
FAC Filed: August 4, 2021

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
NO. 4:21-CV-04077-HSG

1
2

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties stipulate to, and request that the Court enter an
order as follows:

3

WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ counsel has a trial scheduled for December 15-17, 2021, and

4

WHEREAS Defendant’s counsel is amenable to continuing the hearing presently set for

5

December 16, 2021 for (1) the parties’ initial CMC and (2) Defendant’s motion to dismiss

6

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF 32), until the Court’s next available hearing date of

7

March 31, 2022, or as soon thereafter as otherwise available, and

8
9
10

WHEREAS the parties agree to defer propounding discovery while Defendant’s motion to
dismiss is pending, and
WHEREAS the parties agree to extend their deadlines to (1) meet and confer pursuant to

11

Rule 26(f) until twenty-one (21) days prior to the parties’ initial CMC, and (2) exchange Initial

12

Disclosures and submit a Rule 26(f) Report until fourteen (14) days after the parties’ Rule 26(f)

13

conference,

14
15
16
17
18

WHEREAS there have been two prior orders upon stipulation entered in this case (ECF
Nos. 15 and 25), and
WHEREAS granting the parties’ proposed stipulation would facilitate cooperation among
counsel and not appreciably delay the progress of this case.
SO STIPULATED:

19
20

Dated: November 29, 2021

ALEXIS A. AMEZCUA
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

21
By: /s

22

ALEXIS A. AMEZCUA

23

Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
NO. 4:21-CV-04077-HSG

1

1

Dated: November 29, 2021

2

DAVID M. ROSENBERG-WOHL
HERSHENSON ROSENBERG-WOHL,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

3
4

By:
DAVID M. ROSENBERG-WOHL

5

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

6
7
8
9

SO ORDERED:
Dated: November 30, 2021

10

______________________

11
Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
NO. 4:21-CV-04077-HSG

2