Davis v. USP Victorville Unit Officers (2B) on 12/13/2019 et al

Filing 5

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: This action is TRANSFERRED to the Eastern Division of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The Clerk shall transfer the case forthwith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 9/9/2021. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
Case 4:21-cv-05654-DMR Document 5 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MICHAEL L. DAVIS, Case No. 21-cv-05654-DMR (PR) Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER OF TRANSFER 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 USP VICTORVILLE UNIT OFFICERS, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Plaintiff, a federal inmate currently incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary, Atwater, 14 brings this pro se action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), 15 complaining of deprivations of his civil rights.1 Dkt. 1. He has also filed a completed in forma 16 pauperis application. Dkt. 2. 17 On July 23, 2021, the Clerk of the Court informed Plaintiff that this action has been 18 assigned to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 3. Plaintiff has since consented to magistrate 19 judge jurisdiction in this action. Dkt. 4. 20 Plaintiff’s claims seem to stem from incidents that occurred in December 2019 while he 21 was incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary, Victorville (“USP Victorville”), which is in San 22 Bernardino County. Thus, the acts complained of occurred in San Bernardino County, which lies 23 24 25 26 27 28 within the venue of the Eastern Division of the Central District of California, and it appears that Defendants reside in that district. Venue, therefore, properly lies in that district and not in this one. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Accordingly, in the interest of justice and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), this action is Plaintiff actually filed a form entitled “Complaint Under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983,” but because he is a federal prisoner, the court construes this action as being brought under Bivens. See Dkt. 1. 1 Case 4:21-cv-05654-DMR Document 5 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 2 1 TRANSFERRED to the Eastern Division of the United States District Court for the Central 2 District of California.2 The Clerk shall transfer the case forthwith. 3 4 5 6 All pending motions are TERMINATED on this court’s docket as no longer pending in this district. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 9, 2021 ______________________________________ DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Venue transfer is a non-dispositive matter and, thus, it falls within the scope of the jurisdiction of the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?