Raynaldo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

Filing 92

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 90 Stipulation Selecting Private ADR. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2023)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RONALD RAYNALDO, FERNANDA NUNES FERREIRA, GEORGE JONES, ROBERT LIZZUL, MITCHELL BRYON PAZANKI, HARRY RAPP, DENNIS WOODS, DAYANE TESSINARI, BRENDAN SANGER, AND JASON CASEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff(s) v. CASE No C 21-5808-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: ˆ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) ˆ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ˆ Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge (ADR L.R. 7) ■ Private ADR (specify process and provider) ˆ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ˆ the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR) ■ other requested deadline: The Parties anticipate mediation at the end of discovery. ˆ Date: 10/31/2023 Date: 10/31/2023 /s/ Laurence D. King Attorney for Plaintiffs /s/ Rachel A. Straus Attorney for Defendant ˆ  IT IS SO ORDERED. ˆ IT IS SO ORDERED WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS: DATE: 11/7/2023 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-15-2019 1 E-FILING ATTESTATION 2 I, Laurence D. King, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 document. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the signatory 4 identified above has concurred in this filing. 5 6 By: 7 /s/ Laurence D. King Laurence D. King 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1E-FILING ATTESTATION Case No. 4:21-cv-05808-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?