Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address

Filing 11

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 10 Ex Parte Application 10 First Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time Within Which to Effectuate Service on John Doe Defendant and for Continuance of the Initial Case Management Conference. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/22/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2021)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 OAKLAND DIVISION 8 9 STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Case Number: 4:21-cv-06818-HSG 10 Plaintiff, Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 11 vs. 12 JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address, 13 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S EX-PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE ON JOHN DOE DEFENDANT AND FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s ex-parte application for entry of an Order extending the time within which to effectuate service on John Doe Defendant with a summons and Complaint and continuance of the Initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for December 7, 2021, and the Court being duly advised in the premises does hereby: ORDER AND ADJUDGE: Plaintiff’s application is granted. Plaintiff shall have until February 20, 2022 to effectuate service of a summons and Complaint on Defendant and the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for December 7, 2021 is continued to March 22, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. DONE AND ORDERED. Dated: 11/18/2021 By: ____________________________ United States District Judge Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 1 Order on Ex-Parte Application for Extension to Effectuate Service and for Continuance of the Initial Case Management Conference Case No. 4:21-cv-06818-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?