Tesla Motors, Inc. et al v. Balan

Filing 46

ORDER GRANTING 44 Proposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Reset Deadlines Re Docket No. 7 : Responses due by 8/19/2022 and Replies due by 8/26/2022. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/15/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2022)

1
2
3
4

Cristina Balan
[e-mail]
150 E Laurel St, 246
Foley, AL 36535
PRO SE for Respondent

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

OAKLAND DIVISION

8
9

TESLA MOTORS AND ELON MUSK

10

Petitioners,

11
12
13

vs.
CRISTINA BALAN,
Respondent

Case No.: 4:21-cv-09325-HSG
ORDER ON RESPONDENT MOTION TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE THE OPPOSTION TO
THE PETITIONERS PETITON TO CONFIRM
THE ARBITRATION AWARD AS PER ORDER
DKT.41 FROM JULY 26, 2022

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Pending before the court is Responded Cristina Balan’s motion to extend time due to critical
medical conditions Dkt.43. Finding good cause, the Motion to extend time is GRANTED.
Respondent Cristina Balan shall file her Opposition to Petitioners petition to confirm the
arbitration award, August 19, 2022, and the petitioners may file a reply on August 26, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24

Dated: 8/15/2022

____________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM. JR.

25

United State District Judge

26
27
28

ORDER ON RESPONDENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE THE OPPOSTION TO THE PETITIONERS
PETITON TO CONFIRM THE ARBITRATION AWARD AS PER ORDER DKT.41 FROM JULY 26, 2022

-1-