Tesla Motors, Inc. et al v. Balan
ORDER GRANTING 44 Proposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Reset Deadlines Re Docket No. 7 : Responses due by 8/19/2022 and Replies due by 8/26/2022. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/15/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2022)
150 E Laurel St, 246
Foley, AL 36535
PRO SE for Respondent
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TESLA MOTORS AND ELON MUSK
Case No.: 4:21-cv-09325-HSG
ORDER ON RESPONDENT MOTION TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE THE OPPOSTION TO
THE PETITIONERS PETITON TO CONFIRM
THE ARBITRATION AWARD AS PER ORDER
DKT.41 FROM JULY 26, 2022
Pending before the court is Responded Cristina Balan’s motion to extend time due to critical
medical conditions Dkt.43. Finding good cause, the Motion to extend time is GRANTED.
Respondent Cristina Balan shall file her Opposition to Petitioners petition to confirm the
arbitration award, August 19, 2022, and the petitioners may file a reply on August 26, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM. JR.
United State District Judge
ORDER ON RESPONDENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE THE OPPOSTION TO THE PETITIONERS
PETITON TO CONFIRM THE ARBITRATION AWARD AS PER ORDER DKT.41 FROM JULY 26, 2022
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?