LinkedIn Corporation v. Mantheos Pte. Ltd.

Filing 16

ORDER (as modified) by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #15 Stipulation ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2022)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON, LLP Jonathan H. Blavin (SBN 230269) jonathan.blavin@mto.com Nicholas D. Fram (SBN 288293) Nicholas.Fram@mto.com Mica L. Moore (SBN 321473) Mica.Moore@mto.com 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Terry L. Wit (SBN 233473) terrywit@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6331 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 Attorneys for Defendants Mantheos Pte. Ltd., Jeremiah Tang, Yuxi Chew, and Stan Kosyakov Attorneys for Plaintiff LinkedIn Corporation 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND COURTHOUSE 13 14 LinkedIn Corporation, CASE NO. 4:22-cv-00651-HSG 15 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND RESCHEDULING MAY 10, 2022 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (as modified) 16 Plaintiff, v. 17 Mantheos Pte. Ltd., Jeremiah Tang, Yuxi Chew, and Stan Kosyakov, 18 Defendants. 19 Trial Date: None Set 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:22-cv-00651-HSG JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND RESCHEDULING MAY 10, 2022 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff LinkedIn Corporation (“Plaintiff”) and 2 Defendants Mantheos Pte. Ltd., Jeremiah Tang, Yuxi Chew, and Stan Kosyakov (collectively, 3 “Defendants”), through their respective attorneys, stipulate and declare as follows: 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint on February 1, 2022 (ECF No. 1); 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the Complaint on February 3, 2022 (ECF No. 12); 6 WHEREAS, on February 23, 2022, Plaintiff and Defendants stipulated to extend the 7 deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint to March 28, 2022 (ECF No. 14); 8 WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement that will resolve the case in its entirety; 9 WHEREAS, the parties require approximately 50 additional days to comply with the terms 10 of the settlement agreement, at which point the parties will file a stipulated judgment on consent 11 that will resolve the action; 12 WHEREAS, the proposed extension will affect the date set for the case management 13 conference on May 10, 2022. 14 NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 15 1. 16 17 The deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint is extended to May 17, 2022. 2. The case management conference set for May 10, 2022 at 2:00 PM shall be 18 continued to May 31, 2022 at 2:00 PM, or such other time as the Court deems 19 convenient. 20 21 DATED: March 28, 2022 22 23 24 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP By /s/ Terry L. Wit Terry L. Wit Attorneys for Defendants 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:22-cv-00651-HSG 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND RESCHEDULING MAY 10, 2022 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 DATED: March 28, 2022 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON 2 By 3 4 /s/ Jonathan H. Blavin Jonathan H. Blavin Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 12 1. Defendants’ deadline to respond to the complaint is extended to May 17, 2022. 13 2. The case management conference currently set for May 10, 2022 at 2:00 PM is 14 continued to May 31, 2022 at 2:00 PM via telephone. 15 16 17 18 Dated: 3/29/2022 By: Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Court Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:22-cv-00651-HSG -2JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND RESCHEDULING MAY 10, 2022 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?