LinkedIn Corporation v. Mantheos Pte. Ltd.

Filing 16

ORDER (as modified) by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #15 Stipulation ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2022)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON, LLP
Jonathan H. Blavin (SBN 230269)
[e-mail]
Nicholas D. Fram (SBN 288293)
[e-mail]
Mica L. Moore (SBN 321473)
[e-mail]
560 Mission Street, 27th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Terry L. Wit (SBN 233473)
[e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
Mantheos Pte. Ltd., Jeremiah Tang, Yuxi
Chew, and Stan Kosyakov

Attorneys for Plaintiff
LinkedIn Corporation

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND COURTHOUSE

13
14 LinkedIn Corporation,

CASE NO. 4:22-cv-00651-HSG

15

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND RESCHEDULING
MAY 10, 2022 CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE (as modified)

16

Plaintiff,
v.

17 Mantheos Pte. Ltd., Jeremiah Tang, Yuxi
Chew, and Stan Kosyakov,
18
Defendants.
19

Trial Date:

None Set

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:22-cv-00651-HSG
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND
RESCHEDULING MAY 10, 2022 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff LinkedIn Corporation (“Plaintiff”) and

2 Defendants Mantheos Pte. Ltd., Jeremiah Tang, Yuxi Chew, and Stan Kosyakov (collectively,
3 “Defendants”), through their respective attorneys, stipulate and declare as follows:
4

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint on February 1, 2022 (ECF No. 1);

5

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the Complaint on February 3, 2022 (ECF No. 12);

6

WHEREAS, on February 23, 2022, Plaintiff and Defendants stipulated to extend the

7 deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint to March 28, 2022 (ECF No. 14);
8

WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement that will resolve the case in its entirety;

9

WHEREAS, the parties require approximately 50 additional days to comply with the terms

10 of the settlement agreement, at which point the parties will file a stipulated judgment on consent
11 that will resolve the action;
12

WHEREAS, the proposed extension will affect the date set for the case management

13 conference on May 10, 2022.
14

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

15

1.

16
17

The deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint is extended to May 17,
2022.

2.

The case management conference set for May 10, 2022 at 2:00 PM shall be

18

continued to May 31, 2022 at 2:00 PM, or such other time as the Court deems

19

convenient.

20
21 DATED: March 28, 2022
22
23
24

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
By

/s/ Terry L. Wit
Terry L. Wit
Attorneys for Defendants

25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:22-cv-00651-HSG
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND
RESCHEDULING MAY 10, 2022 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1 DATED: March 28, 2022

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON

2
By

3
4

/s/ Jonathan H. Blavin
Jonathan H. Blavin
Attorneys for Plaintiff

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

12

1. Defendants’ deadline to respond to the complaint is extended to May 17, 2022.

13

2. The case management conference currently set for May 10, 2022 at 2:00 PM is

14

continued to May 31, 2022 at 2:00 PM via telephone.

15
16
17
18

Dated: 3/29/2022

By:
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Court Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:22-cv-00651-HSG
-2JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND
RESCHEDULING MAY 10, 2022 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE