Kelly v. Aramark Services, Inc.
Filing
15
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 14 Stipulation Extending Briefing Schedule for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1, 6-2. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2022)
Case 4:22-cv-01272-HSG Document 15 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Eric Meckley, Bar No. 168181
Sarah Zenewicz, Bar No. 258068
Kassia Stephenson, Bar No. 336175
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1596
Tel: +1.415.442.1000
Fax: +1.415.442.1001
eric.meckley@morganlewis.com
sarah.zenewicz@morganlewis.com
kassia.stephenson@morganlewis.com
Attorneys for Defendant
ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
LAWRENCE KELLY, JR, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
vs.
ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendant.
Case No. 4:22-cv-01272-HSG
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULES 6-1, 6-2
Action Filed: March 3, 2022
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
Case No. 4:22-cv-01272-HSG
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS
Case 4:22-cv-01272-HSG Document 15 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 2
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of Plaintiff Lawrence Kelly and Defendant Aramark Services,
3
Inc., Plaintiff’s deadline to file an Opposition to the Motion is June 6, 2022, and Defendant’s
4
deadline to file a Reply is June 20, 2022.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: 5/9/2022
_________________________
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1
Case No. 4:22-cv-01272-HSG
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?