Kelly v. Aramark Services, Inc.

Filing 15

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 14 Stipulation Extending Briefing Schedule for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1, 6-2. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2022)

Download PDF
Case 4:22-cv-01272-HSG Document 15 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Eric Meckley, Bar No. 168181 Sarah Zenewicz, Bar No. 258068 Kassia Stephenson, Bar No. 336175 One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1596 Tel: +1.415.442.1000 Fax: +1.415.442.1001 eric.meckley@morganlewis.com sarah.zenewicz@morganlewis.com kassia.stephenson@morganlewis.com Attorneys for Defendant ARAMARK SERVICES, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 LAWRENCE KELLY, JR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 vs. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendant. Case No. 4:22-cv-01272-HSG ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES 6-1, 6-2 Action Filed: March 3, 2022 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO Case No. 4:22-cv-01272-HSG ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS Case 4:22-cv-01272-HSG Document 15 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 2 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of Plaintiff Lawrence Kelly and Defendant Aramark Services, 3 Inc., Plaintiff’s deadline to file an Opposition to the Motion is June 6, 2022, and Defendant’s 4 deadline to file a Reply is June 20, 2022. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: 5/9/2022 _________________________ HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 1 Case No. 4:22-cv-01272-HSG ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?