Bell v. Facebook, Inc., a Delaware corporation et al
Filing
41
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 19, 2022. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2022)
Case 4:22-cv-02100-JST Document 41 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JACOB M. HEATH (STATE BAR NO. 238959)
jheath@orrick.com
JONATHAN J. LIU (STATE BAR NO. 328955)
jonathanliu@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:
+1 (650) 614 7400
Facsimile:
+1 (650) 614 7401
JAROME BELL
jaromebell@verizon.net
Telephone: +1(757) 318 1306
Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendants
Facebook, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., and Mark
Zuckerberg
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
JAROME BELL,
14
15
16
Case No. 22-cv-02100-JST
Plaintiff,
v.
FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK E.
ZUCKERBERG
JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FED R. CIV. P.
41(a)(1)(A)(ii); [PROPOSED] ORDER
17
18
Defendants.
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 22-CV-02100-JST
Case 4:22-cv-02100-JST Document 41 Filed 09/19/22 Page 2 of 4
1
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Jarome Bell (“Bell”) and Defendants
2
Facebook Inc. and Mark E. Zuckerberg (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate that this
3
action, including all claims filed by the parties, shall be dismissed with prejudice, and without
4
costs, expenses, or attorneys’ fees being awarded to any party. The parties state the following in
5
support of dismissal with prejudice:
6
WHEREAS, on September 13, 2022, Bell indicated to Facebooks’ outside counsel,
7
Jonathan J. Liu, that Bell no longer intended to pursue litigation against Defendants in the case
8
Bell v. Facebook Inc., et al., Case No. 22-cv-02100-JST;
9
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the
10
parties, personally by Bell and by and through their respective counsel for Defendants, that this
11
action shall be dismissed with prejudice, and without costs, expenses, or attorneys’ fees being
12
awarded to any party.
13
14
Dated: September 19, 2022
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFF LLP
15
By: /s/ Jacob M. Heath
JACOB M. HEATH
16
17
Attorney for Defendants Facebook, Inc.
and Mark E. Zuckerberg
18
19
Dated: September 19, 2022
20
21
By: /s/
JAROME BELL (PRO SE)
22
Plaintiff
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
-1-
JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 22-CV-02100-JST
Case 4:22-cv-02100-JST Document 41 Filed 09/19/22 Page 3 of 4
1
2
CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) ATTESTATION
I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each
3
of the other signatories hereto.
4
Dated: September 19, 2022
By:
5
/s/ Jacob M. Heath
JACOB M. HEATH
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
-2-
JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 22-CV-02100-JST
Case 4:22-cv-02100-JST Document 41 Filed 09/19/22 Page 4 of 4
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: September 19, 2022
HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
-3-
JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 22-CV-02100-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?