Bell v. Facebook, Inc., a Delaware corporation et al

Filing 41

ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 19, 2022. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2022)

Download PDF
Case 4:22-cv-02100-JST Document 41 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JACOB M. HEATH (STATE BAR NO. 238959) jheath@orrick.com JONATHAN J. LIU (STATE BAR NO. 328955) jonathanliu@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: +1 (650) 614 7400 Facsimile: +1 (650) 614 7401 JAROME BELL jaromebell@verizon.net Telephone: +1(757) 318 1306 Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants Facebook, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., and Mark Zuckerberg 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 JAROME BELL, 14 15 16 Case No. 22-cv-02100-JST Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK E. ZUCKERBERG JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); [PROPOSED] ORDER 17 18 Defendants. Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 22-CV-02100-JST Case 4:22-cv-02100-JST Document 41 Filed 09/19/22 Page 2 of 4 1 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Jarome Bell (“Bell”) and Defendants 2 Facebook Inc. and Mark E. Zuckerberg (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate that this 3 action, including all claims filed by the parties, shall be dismissed with prejudice, and without 4 costs, expenses, or attorneys’ fees being awarded to any party. The parties state the following in 5 support of dismissal with prejudice: 6 WHEREAS, on September 13, 2022, Bell indicated to Facebooks’ outside counsel, 7 Jonathan J. Liu, that Bell no longer intended to pursue litigation against Defendants in the case 8 Bell v. Facebook Inc., et al., Case No. 22-cv-02100-JST; 9 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the 10 parties, personally by Bell and by and through their respective counsel for Defendants, that this 11 action shall be dismissed with prejudice, and without costs, expenses, or attorneys’ fees being 12 awarded to any party. 13 14 Dated: September 19, 2022 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFF LLP 15 By: /s/ Jacob M. Heath JACOB M. HEATH 16 17 Attorney for Defendants Facebook, Inc. and Mark E. Zuckerberg 18 19 Dated: September 19, 2022 20 21 By: /s/ JAROME BELL (PRO SE) 22 Plaintiff 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP -1- JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 22-CV-02100-JST Case 4:22-cv-02100-JST Document 41 Filed 09/19/22 Page 3 of 4 1 2 CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) ATTESTATION I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each 3 of the other signatories hereto. 4 Dated: September 19, 2022 By: 5 /s/ Jacob M. Heath JACOB M. HEATH 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP -2- JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 22-CV-02100-JST Case 4:22-cv-02100-JST Document 41 Filed 09/19/22 Page 4 of 4 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: September 19, 2022 HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP -3- JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 22-CV-02100-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?