Filing 24

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 22 Stipulation Selecting Private ADR. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2022)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE No C 22-cv-03884-HSG CINDY COLLEY, Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS SNAPMEDTECH, INC., et al., Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:  Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)  Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)  Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge (ADR L.R. 7) ■ Private ADR (specify process and provider)  Private Mediation with mediator Mark Peters. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ■ the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR)   other requested deadline: Date: 9-14-2022 Date: 9-14-2022 /s/ Bruce J. Highman Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Vana Ebrahimi Attorney for Defendant X IT IS SO ORDERED.   IT IS SO ORDERED WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS: DATE: 9/15/2022 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-15-2019

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?