Regents of University of Michigan et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Filing
54
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 52 Stipulation Selecting Private ADR. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2023)
Case 4:22-cv-04913-HSG Document 54 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
MICHIGAN,
and
THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA
BOARD OF TRUSTEES,
Plaintiff(s)
v.
CASE No C 4:22-cv-04913-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS
CORPORATION,
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge (ADR L.R. 7)
■ Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Private mediation with the mediator to be selected by the parties cooperating in good faith
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR)
■ other requested deadline: January 18, 2024
Date: January 17, 2023
Date: January 17, 2023
/s/ John M. Farrell
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Arturo J. González
Attorney for Defendant
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS:
DATE: 1/18/2023
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Important! E-file this form in ECFArturo
using J.the
appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order
González
Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Early
Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.”
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-15-2019
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?