Minahan v. Google, LLC
Filing
34
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. Show Cause Response due by 2/3/2023. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/31/2023. (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2023)
Case 4:22-cv-05652-YGR Document 34 Filed 01/31/23 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
BURKE MINAHAN, ET AL.,
Case No. 4:22-cv-05652-YGR
Plaintiffs,
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: MOTIONS FOR
ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
v.
8
9
Re: Dkt. Nos. 30-31
GOOGLE LLC,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
11
TO PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL JOEL SMITH:
12
Two motions for leave to appear in pro hac vice are pending at Docket Numbers 30 and 31.
13
Mr. Joel Smith is the local co-counsel identified in both motions as sponsoring counsel. The
14
applications identify Mr. Smith’s address as being in Walnut Creek, California. However, the
15
business address that he has registered with the state bar is located in Colorado.
This is a material distinction. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-3(a)(3), the sponsoring
16
17
attorney must be “a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office
18
within the State of California[.]” Given the inconsistencies identified in the public record, it
19
appears that Mr. Smith may be maintaining an office in Colorado as opposed to California, which
20
would justify a denial of both motions. Accordingly, Mr. Smith is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW
21
CAUSE how he maintains an office in California to qualify as counsel. A sworn declaration shall
22
be submitted by no later than February 3, 2023.
Counsel is reminded that updated contact information shall be supplied to the state and this
23
24
25
26
27
28
Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 31, 2023
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?