Minahan v. Google, LLC

Filing 34

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. Show Cause Response due by 2/3/2023. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/31/2023. (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2023)

Download PDF
Case 4:22-cv-05652-YGR Document 34 Filed 01/31/23 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 BURKE MINAHAN, ET AL., Case No. 4:22-cv-05652-YGR Plaintiffs, 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE v. 8 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 30-31 GOOGLE LLC, Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 10 11 TO PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL JOEL SMITH: 12 Two motions for leave to appear in pro hac vice are pending at Docket Numbers 30 and 31. 13 Mr. Joel Smith is the local co-counsel identified in both motions as sponsoring counsel. The 14 applications identify Mr. Smith’s address as being in Walnut Creek, California. However, the 15 business address that he has registered with the state bar is located in Colorado. This is a material distinction. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-3(a)(3), the sponsoring 16 17 attorney must be “a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 18 within the State of California[.]” Given the inconsistencies identified in the public record, it 19 appears that Mr. Smith may be maintaining an office in Colorado as opposed to California, which 20 would justify a denial of both motions. Accordingly, Mr. Smith is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW 21 CAUSE how he maintains an office in California to qualify as counsel. A sworn declaration shall 22 be submitted by no later than February 3, 2023. Counsel is reminded that updated contact information shall be supplied to the state and this 23 24 25 26 27 28 Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 31, 2023 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?