Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al

Filing 268

ORDER GRANTING 266 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Parker Hannifin Corporation as Successor-In-Interest to Sacomo-Sierra Terminated. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 2/5/2024. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2024)

5

MAUNE.RAICHLE.HARTLEY.FRENCH & MUDD, LLC
David L. Amell, Esq. (State Bar No. 227207)
Rabiah N. Oral, Esq. (State Bar No. 319905)
1900 Powell Street, Suite 200
Emeryville, California 94608
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

1
2
3
4

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L.
MARCUS,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16

vs.
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
et.al.
Defendants.

Case No.: 4:22-cv-09058-HSG
[Alameda County Superior Court Case No.:
22CV021840]
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND
ORDER
____________________________________
Courtroom: 02, 4th Floor
District Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.

17
18
19

Filed in State Court: November 15, 2022
Removed to NDCA: December 21, 2022
Trial Date:
August 26, 2024.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Case No. 4:22-cv-09058-HSG]

1
2

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Section

3

41(a)(1)(A)(i)(ii), Plaintiffs Michael R. Marcus and Victoria L. Marcus (“Plaintiffs”) and

4

Defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation as Successor-In-Interest to Sacomo-Sierra.

5

(“Defendant”) hereby stipulates as follows:

6

1. On November 15, 2022, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint for Personal Injury and Loss

7

of Consortium – Asbestos in the Superior Court of the State of California, Couty of Alameda

8

Case No. 22CV021840.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

2. On December 21, 2022, the above action was removed to the United States District
Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 4:22-09058.
4. On January 11, 2024, Plaintiffs and Defendant reached an agreement of all claims in
this action.
Based on the foregoing facts, Plaintiffs and Defendant stipulate and agree to the
following:
This Court should dismiss this Action in its entirety against Defendant Parker Hannifin

16

Corporation as Successor-In-Interest to Sacomo-Sierra, only, without prejudice. Each party to

17

bear its own fees and cost.

18

DATED: January 23, 2024

19

By: _______________________________
Rabiah N. Oral
Attorney for Plaintiffs

20
21
22
23

Maune Raichle Hartley French & Mudd LLC

DATED: February 5, 2024

By: _______________________________
E. Reno Cross
Attorney for Defendant
Parker-Hannifin Corporation

24
25
26
27
28

1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Case No. 4:22-cv-09058-HSG]

1

ORDER

2
3
4

Having read and considered the foregoing stipulation of parties, and good cause
appearing:
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7

DATED: 2/5/2024

8
9

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3042911

1
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE