Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
Filing
271
ORDER GRANTING 269 STIPULATION Of DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FLOWSERVE US, INC. as successor-in-interest to DURAMETALLIC CORPORATION Terminated. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 2/5/2024. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2024)
5
MAUNE.RAICHLE.HARTLEY.FRENCH & MUDD, LLC
David L. Amell, Esq. (State Bar No. 227207)
Rabiah N. Oral, Esq. (State Bar No. 319905)
1900 Powell Street, Suite 200
Emeryville, California 94608
Telephone: (800) 358-5922
Facsimile: (314) 241-4838
damell@mrhfmlaw.com
roral@mrhfmlaw.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
1
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L.
MARCUS,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
vs.
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
et.al.
Defendants.
Case No.: 4:22-cv-09058-HSG
[Alameda County Superior Court Case No.:
22CV021840]
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER
____________________________________
Courtroom: 02, 4th Floor
District Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.
Filed in State Court: November 15, 2022
Removed to NDCA: December 21, 2022
Trial Date:
August 26, 2024.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Case No. 4:22-cv-09058-HSG]
1
2
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Section
3
41(a)(1)(A)(i)(ii), Plaintiffs Michael R. Marcus and Victoria L. Marcus (“Plaintiffs”) and
4
Defendant Flowserve US, Inc., Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Durametallic
5
Corporation (“Defendant”) hereby stipulates as follows:
6
1. On November 15, 2022, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint for Personal Injury and Loss
7
of Consortium – Asbestos in the Superior Court of the State of California, Couty of Alameda
8
Case No. 22CV021840.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
2. On December 21, 2022, the above action was removed to the United States District
Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 4:22-09058.
4. On January 12, 2024, Plaintiffs and Defendant reached an agreement of all claims in
this action.
Based on the foregoing facts, Plaintiffs and Defendant stipulate and agree to the
following:
This Court should dismiss this Action in its entirety against Defendant Flowserve US,
16
Inc., Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Durametallic Corporation, only, without
17
prejudice. Each party to bear its own fees and cost.
18
DATED: January 23, 2024
19
Maune Raichle Hartley French & Mudd LLC
By: _______________________________
Rabiah N. Oral
Attorney for Plaintiffs
20
21
22
23
24
DATED: January 23, 2024
By: _______________________________
Nicole Brown Yuen, Esq.
Attorney for Flowserve US, Inc.,
Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to
Durametallic Corporation
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Case No. 4:22-cv-09058-HSG]
1
2
ORDER
Having read and considered the foregoing stipulation of parties, and good cause appearing:
3
4
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
9
10
DATE: 2/5/2024
11
12
13
14
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Case No. 4:22-cv-09058-HSG]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?