Santos v. Pfizer Inc. et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The court orders Plaintiff to respond by 6/7/2023 and explain Plaintiff's failure to respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit an opposition to the court or (2) file a statement of non -opposition to the motion. The 6/22/2023 01:00 PM hearing on the motion to dismiss is vacated. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 5/17/2023. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Case 4:23-cv-01912-DMR Document 8 Filed 05/17/23 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANA ROMA SANTOS,
Case No. 23-cv-01912-DMR
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
PFIZER INC., et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant Pfizer Inc. filed a motion to dismiss on April 28, 2023. [Docket No. 4.]
Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on June 22, 2023. Plaintiff Ana Roma Santos is
pursuing this action without legal representation. According to the local court rules, Plaintiff
should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendant’s motion by May 12, 2023. See Civ. L.R.
7-3(a). The court has received no such opposition.
The court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond by June 7, 2023 and explain Plaintiff’s failure to
respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit an opposition to the
court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does not
indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiff’s late submission. If Plaintiff does not
respond by June 7, 2023, Defendant’s motion may be granted or the case may be dismissed for
failure to prosecute. The June 22, 2023 hearing on the motion to dismiss is vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 17, 2023
DONNA M. RYU
Chief Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?